Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBPvsXYLGETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PBP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. PBP is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. XYLG performs worse with 0.32% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBP and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBP vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBP XYLG | -0.18%-1.21% | +2.70%+0.63% | +1.44%+0.32% | +14.25%+18.15% | +44.13%+61.54% | +50.08%+65.22% |
| Flows | PBP XYLG | +$1M-$276K | +$13M+$5M | -$2M+$2M | +$191M+$1M | +$220M+$8M | +$153M+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBP XYLG | +7.34%+9.25% | +13.92%+15.74% | +10.22%+12.19% | +11.25%+13.93% |
| Max drawdown | PBP XYLG | -1.67%-2.31% | -10.83%-12.29% | -15.51%-17.16% | -18.35%-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBP XYLG | 13d13d | 90d48d | 240d154d | 679d736d |
PBP | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.68 | $27.28 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $22.73 | $27.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBP | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBP | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.68 | $27.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $326.76 M | $64.19 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBP and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PBP is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has returned 0.32%. That puts PBP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBP or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the PBP ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBP or XYLG?
Over the past year, PBP had a volatility of 13.92%, while XYLG experienced 15.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBP or XYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, PBP holds $326.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $64.19 M.
What sectors do the PBP and XYLG ETFs invest in?
PBP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PBP ETF and XYLG ETF?
PBP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBP or XYLG?
PBP holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
