Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBPvsXYLDETF Comparison
The ETFs Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) track the CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Total Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PBP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XYLD's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. PBP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.6% for XYLD. PBP is up 1.51% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. XYLD performs worse with 1.44% YTD performance, and -$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBP and XYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBP vs XYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBP XYLD | -0.21%-0.24% | +2.74%+2.67% | +1.51%+1.44% | +15.20%+14.87% | +44.47%+43.04% | +49.19%+45.85% |
| Flows | PBP XYLD | +$1M-$27M | +$13M+$50M | -$2M-$41M | +$191M-$77M | +$220M+$706M | +$153M+$3.29B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBP XYLD | +7.34%+7.27% | +13.89%+13.89% | +10.22%+10.25% | +11.25%+11.45% |
| Max drawdown | PBP XYLD | -1.67%-1.68% | -10.83%-10.81% | -15.51%-15.54% | -18.35%-18.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBP XYLD | 14d14d | 90d90d | 240d240d | 679d693d |
PBP | XYLD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $22.75 | $40.51 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $22.73 | $40.49 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBP | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBP | XYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.75 | $40.51 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $326.98 M | $3.11 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.6% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBP and XYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PBP is up 1.51% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLD has returned 1.44%. That puts PBP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBP or XYLD?
Year-to-date, the PBP ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to -$41M for XYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBP or XYLD?
Over the past year, PBP had a volatility of 13.89%, while XYLD experienced 13.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBP or XYLD?
As of March 11, 2026, PBP holds $326.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLD manages $3.11 B.
What sectors do the PBP and XYLD ETFs invest in?
PBP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XYLD focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the PBP ETF and XYLD ETF?
PBP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLD holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBP or XYLD?
PBP holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. XYLD has 577 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.67%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 2: Covered Call ETFs
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 1: A Grand Overview
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Rohan Reddy with Global X
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
