PBPvsXCLRETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. PBP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.25% for XCLR. PBP is up 2.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. XCLR performs worse with 0.1% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBP and XCLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBP vs XCLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBP XCLR | +5.38%+6.88% | +1.04%-1.41% | +2.36%+0.10% | +16.97%+17.55% | +38.84%+47.37% | +47.13%n/a |
| Flows | PBP XCLR | +$9M- | +$16M- | +$8M- | +$189M+$275K | +$232M-$1M | +$163M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBP XCLR | +10.41%+10.25% | +6.90%+9.17% | +10.31%+10.15% | +11.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PBP XCLR | -5.24%-8.12% | -5.24%-8.12% | -15.51%-12.48% | -18.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PBP XCLR | 61d89d | 61d89d | 240d153d | 679dn/a |
PBP | XCLR | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.52 | $26.99 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $22.48 | $26.96 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBP | XCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBP | XCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.52 | $26.99 |
| 1D performance | +0.18% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $333.82 M | $3.24 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15