Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBPvsBWVTFETF Comparison
The ETFs Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) track the CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Total Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PBP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.75% for BWVTF. PBP is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. BWVTF performs better with 1.46% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBP and BWVTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBP vs BWVTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBP BWVTF | -0.18%-0.24% | +2.70%+2.80% | +1.44%+1.46% | +14.25%+15.08% | +44.13%+46.92% | +50.08%+52.42% |
| Flows | PBP BWVTF | +$1M- | +$13M- | -$2M- | +$191M-$715K | +$220M-$900K | +$153M-$1M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBP BWVTF | +7.34%+7.53% | +13.92%+15.14% | +10.22%+11.12% | +11.25%+12.21% |
| Max drawdown | PBP BWVTF | -1.67%-1.82% | -10.83%-11.76% | -15.51%-16.79% | -18.35%-19.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBP BWVTF | 13d12d | 90d91d | 240d240d | 679d686d |
PBP | BWVTF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.68 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $22.73 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBP | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBP | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.68 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | – |
| AuM | $326.76 M | $1.56 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBP and BWVTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PBP is up 1.44% year-to-date (YTD), while BWVTF has returned 1.46%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBP or BWVTF?
Year-to-date, the PBP ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to - for BWVTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBP or BWVTF?
Over the past year, PBP had a volatility of 13.92%, while BWVTF experienced 15.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBP or BWVTF?
As of March 10, 2026, PBP holds $326.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while BWVTF manages $1.56 M.
What sectors do the PBP and BWVTF ETFs invest in?
PBP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BWVTF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PBP ETF and BWVTF ETF?
PBP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BWVTF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBP or BWVTF?
PBP holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. BWVTF has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.54%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
