PBFRvsBUFZETF Comparison
PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PBFR's top 1 sector exposures are Non-Corporate. PBFR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.95% for BUFZ. PBFR is up 6.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$127M in YTD flows. BUFZ performs better with 7.43% YTD performance, and +$225M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBFR and BUFZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBFR vs BUFZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBFR BUFZ | +0.13%+0.35% | +2.37%+2.79% | +6.55%+7.43% | +9.33%+10.52% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | PBFR BUFZ | +$8M+$34M | +$45M+$69M | +$127M+$225M | +$145M+$352M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBFR BUFZ | +4.02%+4.16% | +4.40%+4.96% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PBFR BUFZ | -0.94%-1.01% | -2.85%-3.49% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PBFR BUFZ | 16d15d | 41d42d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
PBFR | BUFZ | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 6:38 PM | $31.11 | $28.39 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $31.15 | $28.44 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PBFR | BUFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.11 | $28.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $217.63 M | $1.07 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.95% |
PBFR | BUFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PGIM | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2 | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2024 | October 25, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 13 holdings out of 13
Total weight of top 12 holdings out of 12
