PBFRvsBUFQETF Comparison
PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and FT Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs (BUFQ) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PBFR's top 1 sector exposures are Non-Corporate. PBFR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 1% for BUFQ. PBFR is up 6.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$127M in YTD flows. BUFQ performs better with 11.02% YTD performance, and +$337M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBFR and BUFQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBFR vs BUFQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBFR BUFQ | +0.13%+0.78% | +2.37%+2.32% | +6.55%+11.02% | +9.33%+15.29% | n/a+55.54% | n/an/a |
| Flows | PBFR BUFQ | +$8M+$42M | +$45M+$125M | +$127M+$337M | +$145M+$388M | -+$1.06B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBFR BUFQ | +4.02%+9.21% | +4.40%+8.78% | n/a+11.34% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PBFR BUFQ | -0.94%-4.09% | -2.85%-5.34% | n/a-15.97% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PBFR BUFQ | 16d49d | 41d70d | n/a110d | n/an/a |
PBFR | BUFQ | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.09 | $39.57 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $31.15 | $39.68 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PBFR | BUFQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.09 | $39.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $217.63 M | $1.62 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 1% |
PBFR | BUFQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PGIM | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2 | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2024 | June 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 13 holdings out of 13
Total weight of top 4 holdings out of 4
