Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PAVEvsDRESETF Comparison
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) belongs to the Infrastructure segment. GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PAVE's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Utilities. In contrast, DRES's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Energy. PAVE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.25% for DRES. PAVE is up 8.76% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.05B in YTD flows. DRES performs better with 10.02% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAVE and DRES below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PAVE vs DRES performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAVE DRES | -6.58%-5.33% | +5.17%+6.86% | +8.76%+10.02% | +38.54%n/a | +92.66%n/a | +119.98%n/a |
| Flows | PAVE DRES | +$565M+$872K | +$1.31B+$4M | +$1.05B+$3M | +$1.28B- | +$3.60B- | +$5.55B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAVE DRES | +19.64%+19.42% | +22.57%n/a | +20.32%n/a | +21.77%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PAVE DRES | -7.29%-6.43% | -14.24%n/a | -26.27%n/a | -26.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PAVE DRES | 17d8d | 37dn/a | 239dn/a | 239dn/a |
PAVE | DRES | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.98 | $28.12 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $52.07 | $28.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PAVE | DRES | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PAVE | DRES | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.98 | $28.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | +0.01% |
| AuM | $11.86 B | $35.43 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PAVE and DRES ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PAVE is up 8.76% year-to-date (YTD), while DRES has returned 10.02%. That puts DRES better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAVE or DRES?
Year-to-date, the PAVE ETF saw +$1.05B in flows, compared to +$3M for DRES.
Which ETF is bigger: PAVE or DRES?
As of March 11, 2026, PAVE holds $11.86 B in assets under management (AUM), while DRES manages $35.43 M.
What sectors do the PAVE and DRES ETFs invest in?
PAVE leans toward sectors like Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, DRES focuses on Industrials, Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the PAVE ETF and DRES ETF?
PAVE top holdings include HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, PARKER HANNIFIN and QUANTA SERVICES. DRES holds in its top three: UNION PACIFIC U, NORTHROP GRUMMAN and CSX.
Which ETF is more diversified: PAVE or DRES?
PAVE holds 98 securities with 45.12% of its assets in the top 15. DRES has 37 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.4%.
Notable ETF Filings Recap: March 2024
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
