Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PAMCvsSMCOETF Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PAMC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SMCO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. PAMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.55% for SMCO. PAMC is up 4.78% year-to-date (YTD) with -$79K in YTD flows. SMCO performs worse with 2.24% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAMC and SMCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PAMC vs SMCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAMC SMCO | -3.37%-6.57% | +1.05%-1.26% | +4.78%+2.24% | +17.63%+17.97% | +58.87%n/a | +42.28%n/a |
| Flows | PAMC SMCO | -$12K-$1M | -$2M+$11M | -$79K+$9M | -$20M+$31M | +$6M- | +$19M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAMC SMCO | +18.55%+16.51% | +20.34%+20.15% | +18.07%n/a | +20.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PAMC SMCO | -6.15%-6.69% | -13.36%-13.74% | -25.78%n/a | -27.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PAMC SMCO | 17d31d | 43d46d | 422dn/a | 955dn/a |
PAMC | SMCO | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.69 | $27.35 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $48.79 | $27.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PAMC | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PAMC | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.69 | $27.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $58.46 M | $145.70 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.55% |
PAMC | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Hilton Capital Management |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 134 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | November 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PAMC and SMCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PAMC is up 4.78% year-to-date (YTD), while SMCO has returned 2.24%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAMC or SMCO?
Year-to-date, the PAMC ETF saw -$79K in flows, compared to +$9M for SMCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: PAMC or SMCO?
Over the past year, PAMC had a volatility of 20.34%, while SMCO experienced 20.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: PAMC or SMCO?
As of March 11, 2026, PAMC holds $58.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMCO manages $145.70 M.
What sectors do the PAMC and SMCO ETFs invest in?
PAMC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SMCO focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PAMC ETF and SMCO ETF?
PAMC top holdings include ALCOA CORP, ECHOSTAR and TD SYNNEX. SMCO holds in its top three: DYCOM INDUSTRIES, TELEDYNE TECH and CIENA.
Which ETF is more diversified: PAMC or SMCO?
PAMC holds 139 securities with 21.18% of its assets in the top 15. SMCO has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.52%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
