Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PAMCvsRWKETF Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. PAMC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, RWK's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. PAMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.39% for RWK. PAMC is up 5.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$79K in YTD flows. RWK performs worse with 1.1% YTD performance, and +$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAMC and RWK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PAMC vs RWK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAMC RWK | -3.48%-7.08% | +2.27%-0.95% | +5.01%+1.10% | +17.06%+18.26% | +56.89%+49.01% | +45.88%+61.96% |
| Flows | PAMC RWK | -$12K+$9M | -$2M+$26M | -$79K+$21M | -$20M+$113M | +$6M+$411M | +$19M+$479M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAMC RWK | +18.65%+15.50% | +20.35%+21.92% | +18.09%+18.91% | +20.50%+21.22% |
| Max drawdown | PAMC RWK | -6.15%-8.03% | -13.36%-15.03% | -25.78%-24.50% | -27.11%-24.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | PAMC RWK | 16d30d | 43d46d | 422d274d | 955d274d |
PAMC | RWK | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.69 | $128.19 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $48.79 | $127.86 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PAMC | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PAMC | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.69 | $128.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | +0.26% |
| AuM | $58.59 M | $1.08 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.39% |
PAMC | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 134 | 381 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | February 20, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PAMC and RWK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PAMC is up 5.01% year-to-date (YTD), while RWK has returned 1.1%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAMC or RWK?
Year-to-date, the PAMC ETF saw -$79K in flows, compared to +$21M for RWK.
Which ETF is more volatile: PAMC or RWK?
Over the past year, PAMC had a volatility of 20.35%, while RWK experienced 21.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: PAMC or RWK?
As of March 10, 2026, PAMC holds $58.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWK manages $1.08 B.
What sectors do the PAMC and RWK ETFs invest in?
PAMC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, RWK focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the PAMC ETF and RWK ETF?
PAMC top holdings include ALCOA CORP, ECHOSTAR and TD SYNNEX. RWK holds in its top three: ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: PAMC or RWK?
PAMC holds 139 securities with 21.18% of its assets in the top 15. RWK has 398 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
