PAMCvsQVMMETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PAMC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, QVMM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. PAMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.15% for QVMM. PAMC is up 19.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QVMM performs worse with 18.77% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAMC and QVMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PAMC vs QVMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAMC QVMM | +1.17%+1.70% | +6.14%+7.26% | +19.13%+18.77% | +28.50%+26.35% | +60.40%+53.08% | +63.12%+56.15% |
| Flows | PAMC QVMM | +$14M-$353K | +$3M-$353K | +$3M+$2M | -$6M-$1M | +$13M+$35M | +$11M+$98M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAMC QVMM | +18.18%+15.17% | +18.94%+15.48% | +18.60%+17.82% | +20.37%+19.37% |
| Max drawdown | PAMC QVMM | -4.82%-4.70% | -10.32%-8.41% | -25.78%-23.85% | -26.73%-23.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | PAMC QVMM | 16d26d | 89d42d | 422d379d | 801d379d |
Trading data
PAMC | QVMM | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.10 | $36.11 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $55.41 | $36.33 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PAMC | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PAMC | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.10 | $36.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $69.16 M | $440.46 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
PAMC | QVMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 151 | 360 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PAMC
USA
93.62%
Other
6.38%
QVMM
USA
96.32%
Other
3.68%
Sectors
PAMC
Finance
25.1%
Industrials
20.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.49%
Technology
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.26%
Energy
7.78%
Other
14.87%
QVMM
Finance
22.85%
Industrials
20.27%
Technology
13.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.98%
Healthcare
7.49%
Other
24.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.1%
QVMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PAMC
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.16%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.08%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.79%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.68%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.64%
TechnipFMC plc
1.63%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.55%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.42%
nVent Electric Plc
1.41%
MKS, Inc.
1.40%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.33%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.29%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.28%
QVMM
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.84%
MasTec, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
MKS, Inc.
0.81%
Twilio, Inc.
0.81%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.80%
Entegris, Inc.
0.80%
Everpure, Inc.
0.79%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
TechnipFMC plc
0.77%
Woodward, Inc.
0.74%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.74%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about PAMC and QVMM
How have the PAMC and QVMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, PAMC is up 19.13% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMM has returned 18.77%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAMC or QVMM?
Year-to-date, the PAMC ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$2M for QVMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PAMC or QVMM?
Over the past year, PAMC had a volatility of 18.94%, while QVMM experienced 15.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: PAMC or QVMM?
As of August 4, 2026, PAMC holds $69.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMM manages $440.46 M.
What sectors do the PAMC and QVMM ETFs invest in?
PAMC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, QVMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PAMC ETF and QVMM ETF?
PAMC top holdings include Curtiss-Wright Corp., Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. QVMM holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., nVent Electric Plc and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PAMC or QVMM?
PAMC holds 151 securities with 24.1% of its assets in the top 15. QVMM has 360 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.99%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
