PAMCvsIJHETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. PAMC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, IJH's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. PAMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.05% for IJH. PAMC is up 19.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. IJH performs worse with 17.89% YTD performance, and +$5.56B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAMC and IJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PAMC vs IJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAMC IJH | +1.17%+1.38% | +6.14%+7.34% | +19.13%+17.89% | +28.50%+24.77% | +60.40%+50.76% | +63.12%+55.55% |
| Flows | PAMC IJH | +$14M+$930M | +$3M+$2.95B | +$3M+$5.56B | -$6M+$6.98B | +$13M+$15.31B | +$11M+$27.02B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAMC IJH | +18.18%+14.83% | +18.94%+15.69% | +18.60%+17.94% | +20.37%+19.60% |
| Max drawdown | PAMC IJH | -4.82%-4.26% | -10.32%-8.82% | -25.78%-24.00% | -26.73%-24.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | PAMC IJH | 16d26d | 89d53d | 422d379d | 801d379d |
Trading data
PAMC | IJH | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.10 | $77.00 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $55.41 | $77.48 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PAMC | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PAMC | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.10 | $77.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.62% |
| AuM | $69.16 M | $126.10 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.05% |
Characteristics
PAMC | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | S&P MidCap 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 151 | 404 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PAMC
USA
93.62%
Other
6.38%
IJH
USA
96.09%
Other
3.91%
Sectors
PAMC
Finance
25.1%
Industrials
20.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.49%
Technology
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.26%
Energy
7.78%
Other
14.87%
IJH
Finance
21.89%
Industrials
18.65%
Technology
15.3%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.62%
Healthcare
8.5%
Other
25.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.1%
IJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PAMC
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.16%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.08%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.79%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.68%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.64%
TechnipFMC plc
1.63%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.55%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.42%
nVent Electric Plc
1.41%
MKS, Inc.
1.40%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.33%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.29%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.28%
IJH
Twilio, Inc.
0.86%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.84%
MKS, Inc.
0.82%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.77%
Entegris, Inc.
0.75%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.74%
Illumina, Inc.
0.73%
TechnipFMC plc
0.72%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.71%
MasTec, Inc.
0.70%
Woodward, Inc.
0.69%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.68%
Everpure, Inc.
0.68%
XPO, Inc.
0.66%
Frequently asked questions about PAMC and IJH
How have the PAMC and IJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, PAMC is up 19.13% year-to-date (YTD), while IJH has returned 17.89%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAMC or IJH?
Year-to-date, the PAMC ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$5.56B for IJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: PAMC or IJH?
Over the past year, PAMC had a volatility of 18.94%, while IJH experienced 15.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: PAMC or IJH?
As of August 4, 2026, PAMC holds $69.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while IJH manages $126.10 B.
What sectors do the PAMC and IJH ETFs invest in?
PAMC leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, IJH focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PAMC ETF and IJH ETF?
PAMC top holdings include Curtiss-Wright Corp., Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. IJH holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and MKS, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PAMC or IJH?
PAMC holds 151 securities with 24.1% of its assets in the top 15. IJH has 404 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.11%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
