PAMCvsCSMDETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PAMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, CSMD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. PAMC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.9% for CSMD. PAMC is up 12.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$79K in YTD flows. CSMD performs worse with 2.93% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAMC and CSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PAMC vs CSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAMC CSMD | +6.70%+5.20% | +5.69%-1.76% | +12.23%+2.93% | +26.42%+12.62% | +63.99%n/a | +45.80%n/a |
| Flows | PAMC CSMD | --$4M | -$12M-$8M | -$79K+$10M | -$16M+$111M | +$8M- | +$12M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAMC CSMD | +22.43%+23.48% | +17.90%+18.74% | +18.34%n/a | +20.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PAMC CSMD | -9.97%-12.77% | -10.32%-14.80% | -25.78%n/a | -27.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PAMC CSMD | 47d84d | 89d102d | 422dn/a | 955dn/a |
Trading data
PAMC | CSMD | |
Last sale 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.96 | $33.84 |
| Previous close 05/04/2026 | $52.17 | $32.54 |
| Consolidated volume 05/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPAMC | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PAMC | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.96 | $33.84 |
| 1D performance | +1.52% | +4.00% |
| AuM | $62.62 M | $428.53 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.9% |
Characteristics
PAMC | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 125 | 42 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PAMC
USA
87.74%
Other
12.26%
CSMD
USA
88.92%
Other
11.08%
Sectors
PAMC
Industrials
29.84%
Information Techn.
18.46%
Health Care
13.06%
Materials
8.61%
Other
30.03%
CSMD
Industrials
23.29%
Health Care
18.63%
Information Techn.
17.92%
Consumer Discreti.
9.45%
Other
30.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.5%
CSMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
PAMC
CURTISS WRIGHT
3.71%
WOODWARD
2.88%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.41%
FABRINET
2.29%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
2.27%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.20%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD
2.05%
RBC BEARINGS
2.01%
API GROUP CORP
1.96%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
1.96%
TECHNIPFMC PLC
1.91%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
1.76%
US87422Q1094
1.75%
PURE STORAGE
1.68%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC
1.66%
CSMD
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
6.26%
CURTISS WRIGHT
4.19%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
4.09%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA
3.34%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
3.22%
VALMONT INDUSTRS
3.14%
PENUMBRA
3.06%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.83%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.79%
RAMBUS
2.70%
US4859241048
2.57%
PRESTIGE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE
2.52%
MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC
2.52%
TRACTOR SUPPLY
2.48%
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS
2.45%
Frequently asked questions about PAMC and CSMD
How have the PAMC and CSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 4, 2026, PAMC is up 12.23% year-to-date (YTD), while CSMD has returned 2.93%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PAMC or CSMD?
Year-to-date, the PAMC ETF saw -$79K in flows, compared to +$10M for CSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PAMC or CSMD?
Over the past year, PAMC had a volatility of 17.9%, while CSMD experienced 18.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: PAMC or CSMD?
As of May 4, 2026, PAMC holds $62.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSMD manages $428.53 M.
What sectors do the PAMC and CSMD ETFs invest in?
PAMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, CSMD focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PAMC ETF and CSMD ETF?
PAMC top holdings include CURTISS WRIGHT, WOODWARD and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC. CSMD holds in its top three: STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC, CURTISS WRIGHT and NVENT ELECTRIC PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: PAMC or CSMD?
PAMC holds 133 securities with 32.5% of its assets in the top 15. CSMD has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.16%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
