Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PALCvsMFUSETF Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PALC's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, MFUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. PALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.3% for MFUS. PALC is down -0.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. MFUS performs better with 1.45% YTD performance, and +$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PALC and MFUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PALC vs MFUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PALC MFUS | -6.38%-5.51% | -1.23%+0.62% | -0.56%+1.45% | +8.60%+15.96% | +62.01%+63.70% | +52.08%+73.69% |
| Flows | PALC MFUS | +$31M+$24M | +$4M+$12M | +$15M+$29M | -$78M+$46M | -$56M+$56M | +$153M+$91M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PALC MFUS | +13.31%+11.35% | +14.99%+15.72% | +14.42%+13.22% | +16.32%+15.10% |
| Max drawdown | PALC MFUS | -7.06%-5.93% | -12.25%-12.01% | -17.18%-15.37% | -24.36%-18.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | PALC MFUS | 19d37d | 99d46d | 327d124d | 809d597d |
PALC | MFUS | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.90 | $57.43 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $52.35 | $58.16 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PALC | MFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PALC | MFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.90 | $57.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.86% | -1.25% |
| AuM | $262.03 M | $242.19 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.3% |
PALC | MFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | PIMCO |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 794 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | August 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PALC and MFUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 20, 2026, PALC is down -0.56% year-to-date (YTD), while MFUS has returned 1.45%. That puts MFUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PALC or MFUS?
Year-to-date, the PALC ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$29M for MFUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: PALC or MFUS?
Over the past year, PALC had a volatility of 14.99%, while MFUS experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: PALC or MFUS?
As of March 20, 2026, PALC holds $262.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while MFUS manages $242.19 M.
What sectors do the PALC and MFUS ETFs invest in?
PALC leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, MFUS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the PALC ETF and MFUS ETF?
PALC top holdings include MERCK & CO INC, UNITEDHEALTH GRP and PEPSICO U. MFUS holds in its top three: JOHNSON&JOHNSON, WALMART INC and AT&T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PALC or MFUS?
PALC holds 179 securities with 37.42% of its assets in the top 15. MFUS has 831 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.25%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
