OVMvsPTLCETF Comparison
VS
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. OVM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.81%, versus 0.6% for PTLC. OVM is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. PTLC performs better with 8.42% YTD performance, and -$257M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OVM and PTLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OVM vs PTLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OVM PTLC | +0.30%+2.11% | -3.18%+2.41% | +0.41%+8.42% | +1.57%+11.39% | +16.42%+52.30% | +3.14%+61.39% |
| Flows | OVM PTLC | -$209K-$30M | +$2M-$50M | +$11M-$257M | +$15M-$374M | +$32M-$27M | +$37M+$167M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OVM PTLC | +6.62%+10.98% | +5.00%+12.12% | +5.32%+12.28% | +5.39%+11.94% |
| Max drawdown | OVM PTLC | -5.76%-3.38% | -6.33%-8.81% | -8.08%-15.08% | -15.59%-15.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | OVM PTLC | 92d16d | 101d98d | 306d247d | 1392d247d |
Trading data
OVM | PTLC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.69 | $59.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $20.74 | $60.27 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OVM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOVM | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OVM | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.69 | $59.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $43.66 M | $3.34 B |
| E/R | 0.81% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
OVM | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Overlay Shares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OVM
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
OVM
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
OVM
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
OVM
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about OVM and PTLC
How have the OVM and PTLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, OVM is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD), while PTLC has returned 8.42%. That puts PTLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OVM or PTLC?
Year-to-date, the OVM ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to -$257M for PTLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: OVM or PTLC?
Over the past year, OVM had a volatility of 5%, while PTLC experienced 12.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: OVM or PTLC?
As of October 15, 2026, OVM holds $43.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while PTLC manages $3.34 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
