OUSMvsSRHQETF Comparison
VS
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OUSM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, SRHQ's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Finance. OUSM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.35% for SRHQ. OUSM is up 11.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$157M in YTD flows. SRHQ performs better with 22.06% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSM and SRHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OUSM vs SRHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSM SRHQ | -2.77%-3.55% | +3.95%+8.92% | +11.71%+22.06% | +9.37%+25.57% | +42.09%+68.10% | +48.03%n/a |
| Flows | OUSM SRHQ | -$22M- | -$79M+$2M | -$157M+$2M | -$227M+$2M | +$305M+$18M | +$489M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSM SRHQ | +12.42%+13.62% | +12.79%+14.76% | +15.11%+15.77% | +16.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OUSM SRHQ | -4.02%-4.30% | -9.24%-6.38% | -19.49%-18.39% | -19.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSM SRHQ | 24d28d | 124d40d | 435d303d | 435dn/a |
Trading data
OUSM | SRHQ | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.19 | |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $48.34 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OUSM | SRHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OUSM | SRHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $48.19 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.30% |
| AuM | $829.75 M | $214.44 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
OUSM | SRHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | O'Shares | SRH Funds |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index | SRH U.S. Quality GARP Index |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 80 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2016 | October 5, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OUSM
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
SRHQ
USA
100%
Other
-0%
Sectors
OUSM
Finance
22.18%
Industrials
18.11%
Technology
11.54%
Consumer Services
9.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.72%
Healthcare
8.47%
Other
21.18%
SRHQ
Healthcare
20.02%
Technology
17.82%
Finance
17.75%
Industrials
12.94%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.61%
Business Services
8.07%
Other
14.8%
Advertisement
Diversification
OUSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.61%
SRHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.73%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OUSM
Chemed Corp.
2.42%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.34%
SEI Investments Co.
2.23%
National HealthCare Corp.
2.20%
Primerica, Inc.
2.19%
Radian Group Inc.
2.18%
MGIC Investment Corp.
2.17%
Essent Group Ltd.
2.15%
Donaldson Co., Inc.
2.11%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.02%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
The New York Times Co.
1.93%
Avnet, Inc.
1.92%
ITT, Inc.
1.91%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
SRHQ
Humana, Inc.
2.31%
Centene Corp.
2.09%
Insperity, Inc.
2.06%
Qualys, Inc.
1.81%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.71%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.69%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
1.67%
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.62%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.61%
Gen Digital, Inc.
1.61%
Dropbox, Inc.
1.58%
Frontdoor, Inc.
1.51%
Arcosa, Inc.
1.51%
Credit Acceptance Corp.
1.48%
Box, Inc.
1.47%
Frequently asked questions about OUSM and SRHQ
How have the OUSM and SRHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, OUSM is up 11.71% year-to-date (YTD), while SRHQ has returned 22.06%. That puts SRHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSM or SRHQ?
Year-to-date, the OUSM ETF saw -$157M in flows, compared to +$2M for SRHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSM or SRHQ?
Over the past year, OUSM had a volatility of 12.79%, while SRHQ experienced 14.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSM or SRHQ?
As of September 9, 2026, OUSM holds $829.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while SRHQ manages $214.44 M.
What sectors do the OUSM and SRHQ ETFs invest in?
OUSM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, SRHQ focuses on Healthcare, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the OUSM ETF and SRHQ ETF?
OUSM top holdings include Chemed Corp., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and SEI Investments Co.. SRHQ holds in its top three: Humana, Inc., Centene Corp. and Insperity, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSM or SRHQ?
OUSM holds 109 securities with 31.61% of its assets in the top 15. SRHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.73%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
