Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OUSMvsPAMCETF Comparison
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OUSM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. OUSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. OUSM is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$24M in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 5.01% YTD performance, and -$79K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSM and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OUSM vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSM PAMC | -4.57%-3.48% | +4.11%+2.27% | +3.14%+5.01% | +7.24%+17.06% | +36.56%+56.89% | +48.45%+45.88% |
| Flows | OUSM PAMC | -$6M-$12K | -$27M-$2M | -$24M-$79K | -$33M-$20M | +$565M+$6M | +$631M+$19M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSM PAMC | +13.58%+18.65% | +17.31%+20.35% | +15.30%+18.09% | +16.56%+20.50% |
| Max drawdown | OUSM PAMC | -5.17%-6.15% | -11.91%-13.36% | -19.49%-25.78% | -19.49%-27.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSM PAMC | 26d16d | 44d43d | 435d422d | 435d955d |
OUSM | PAMC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.69 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $48.79 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OUSM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OUSM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $48.69 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.21% |
| AuM | $900.38 M | $58.59 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.6% |
OUSM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | O'Shares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 107 | 134 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2016 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OUSM and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, OUSM is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 5.01%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSM or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the OUSM ETF saw -$24M in flows, compared to -$79K for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSM or PAMC?
Over the past year, OUSM had a volatility of 17.31%, while PAMC experienced 20.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSM or PAMC?
As of March 9, 2026, OUSM holds $900.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $58.59 M.
What sectors do the OUSM and PAMC ETFs invest in?
OUSM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the OUSM ETF and PAMC ETF?
OUSM top holdings include DONALDSON, NATIONAL HEALTHCARE and AVNET. PAMC holds in its top three: ALCOA CORP, ECHOSTAR and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSM or PAMC?
OUSM holds 107 securities with 32.68% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 139 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.18%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
