OUSMvsLSATETF Comparison
VS
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. OUSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.99% for LSAT. OUSM is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$178M in YTD flows. LSAT performs better with 22.04% YTD performance, and -$44M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSM and LSAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OUSM vs LSAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSM LSAT | +4.02%+7.01% | -0.13%+3.38% | +12.38%+22.04% | +10.93%+17.94% | +52.03%+53.87% | +46.27%+48.80% |
| Flows | OUSM LSAT | -$12M+$1M | -$70M+$2M | -$178M-$44M | -$208M-$22M | +$257M-$158M | +$467M-$88M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSM LSAT | +12.25%+14.12% | +12.81%+13.41% | +15.05%+14.67% | +16.43%+16.36% |
| Max drawdown | OUSM LSAT | -8.53%-7.64% | -9.24%-7.64% | -19.49%-18.25% | -19.49%-20.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSM LSAT | 71d58d | 124d58d | 435d507d | 435d776d |
Trading data
OUSM | LSAT | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 7:56 PM | $47.45 | |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $47.77 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LSAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 7:56 PM
Live
Closed
OUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $47.45 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.67% |
| AuM | $811.06 M | $70.00 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.99% |
Characteristics
OUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | O'Shares | LeaderShares ETFs |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 31 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2016 | October 14, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OUSM
USA
97.71%
Other
2.29%
LSAT
USA
98.98%
Other
1.02%
Sectors
OUSM
Finance
22.56%
Industrials
18.22%
Technology
11.87%
Consumer Services
9.23%
Healthcare
8.53%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.36%
Other
21.24%
LSAT
Finance
22.69%
Industrials
18.42%
Technology
14.98%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.07%
Other
34.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
OUSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.67%
LSAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
OUSM
SEI Investments Co.
2.39%
Chemed Corp.
2.34%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.22%
MGIC Investment Corp.
2.20%
Essent Group Ltd.
2.19%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.11%
National HealthCare Corp.
2.10%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
2.07%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
2.07%
H&R Block, Inc.
2.06%
Donaldson Co., Inc.
2.02%
Radian Group Inc.
2.00%
Encompass Health Corp.
1.97%
Primerica, Inc.
1.96%
ITT, Inc.
1.95%
LSAT
Morningstar, Inc.
4.44%
SM Energy Co.
4.40%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
4.29%
H&R Block, Inc.
4.21%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.71%
Science Applications International Corp.
3.64%
GoDaddy, Inc.
3.64%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
3.59%
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
3.54%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.53%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
3.50%
MGIC Investment Corp.
3.40%
Match Group, Inc.
3.38%
Kemper Corp.
3.23%
American International Group, Inc.
3.19%
Frequently asked questions about OUSM and LSAT
How have the OUSM and LSAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, OUSM is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while LSAT has returned 22.04%. That puts LSAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSM or LSAT?
Year-to-date, the OUSM ETF saw -$178M in flows, compared to -$44M for LSAT.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSM or LSAT?
Over the past year, OUSM had a volatility of 12.81%, while LSAT experienced 13.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSM or LSAT?
As of October 26, 2026, OUSM holds $811.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while LSAT manages $70.00 M.
What sectors do the OUSM and LSAT ETFs invest in?
OUSM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, LSAT focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OUSM ETF and LSAT ETF?
OUSM top holdings include SEI Investments Co., Chemed Corp. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. LSAT holds in its top three: Morningstar, Inc., SM Energy Co. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSM or LSAT?
OUSM holds 109 securities with 31.67% of its assets in the top 15. LSAT has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
