Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OUSMvsLSATETF Comparison
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is part of the US Large Cap segment. OUSM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, LSAT's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. OUSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.99% for LSAT. OUSM is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$24M in YTD flows. LSAT performs worse with 1.65% YTD performance, and -$43M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSM and LSAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OUSM vs LSAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSM LSAT | -4.57%-2.01% | +4.11%+1.04% | +3.14%+1.65% | +7.24%+1.35% | +36.56%+29.32% | +48.45%+35.28% |
| Flows | OUSM LSAT | -$6M- | -$27M-$17M | -$24M-$43M | -$33M-$49M | +$565M-$155M | +$631M-$53M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSM LSAT | +13.58%+13.78% | +17.31%+17.37% | +15.30%+15.31% | +16.56%+16.32% |
| Max drawdown | OUSM LSAT | -5.17%-3.20% | -11.91%-13.45% | -19.49%-18.25% | -19.49%-20.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSM LSAT | 26d23d | 44d91d | 435d469d | 435d776d |
OUSM | LSAT | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.14 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $39.14 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $39.14 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.00% |
| AuM | $900.38 M | $59.30 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.99% |
OUSM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | O'Shares | LeaderShares ETFs |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 107 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2016 | October 14, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OUSM and LSAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, OUSM is up 3.14% year-to-date (YTD), while LSAT has returned 1.65%. That puts OUSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSM or LSAT?
Year-to-date, the OUSM ETF saw -$24M in flows, compared to -$43M for LSAT.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSM or LSAT?
Over the past year, OUSM had a volatility of 17.31%, while LSAT experienced 17.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSM or LSAT?
As of March 9, 2026, OUSM holds $900.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while LSAT manages $59.30 M.
What sectors do the OUSM and LSAT ETFs invest in?
OUSM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LSAT focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OUSM ETF and LSAT ETF?
OUSM top holdings include DONALDSON, NATIONAL HEALTHCARE and AVNET. LSAT holds in its top three: CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS and SOUTHWEST AIRLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSM or LSAT?
OUSM holds 107 securities with 32.68% of its assets in the top 15. LSAT has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
