OSCVvsSMMDETF Comparison
VS
Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OSCV's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, SMMD's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. OSCV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.23% for SMMD. OSCV is up 16.83% year-to-date (YTD) with -$27M in YTD flows. SMMD performs better with 23.09% YTD performance, and +$907M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OSCV and SMMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OSCV vs SMMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OSCV SMMD | +2.21%+0.84% | +4.36%+7.08% | +16.83%+23.09% | +18.46%+34.40% | +34.95%+61.37% | +40.91%+51.41% |
| Flows | OSCV SMMD | -$41M+$59M | -$19K+$438M | -$27M+$907M | -$9M+$1.48B | +$311M+$2.00B | +$445M+$2.50B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OSCV SMMD | +10.48%+17.76% | +12.69%+17.85% | +15.59%+19.43% | +17.17%+20.98% |
| Max drawdown | OSCV SMMD | -3.13%-4.22% | -7.80%-9.48% | -22.97%-25.55% | -22.97%-28.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | OSCV SMMD | 48d16d | 59d43d | 436d283d | 436d980d |
Trading data
OSCV | SMMD | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 4:15 PM | $42.95 | $91.46 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $43.02 | $91.85 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OSCV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOSCV | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 4:15 PM
Live
Closed
OSCV | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.95 | $91.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $710.73 M | $3.70 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
OSCV | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | APTUS ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 66 | 2467 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2018 | July 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OSCV
USA
89.15%
Other
10.85%
SMMD
USA
95.04%
Other
4.96%
Sectors
OSCV
Finance
37.66%
Industrials
15.02%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.18%
Energy
7.45%
Other
28.69%
SMMD
Finance
23.86%
Industrials
15.48%
Healthcare
14.26%
Technology
13.89%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.19%
Other
24.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
OSCV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.49%
SMMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OSCV
Arcosa, Inc.
2.74%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.73%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
2.72%
nVent Electric Plc
2.67%
Hawkins, Inc.
2.47%
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
2.41%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.38%
PriceSmart, Inc.
2.29%
A10 Networks, Inc.
2.28%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp.
2.26%
The Ensign Group, Inc.
2.17%
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
2.14%
Primerica, Inc.
2.11%
Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
2.08%
Wintrust Financial Corp.
2.04%
SMMD
MKS, Inc.
0.40%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.40%
nVent Electric Plc
0.36%
ATI, Inc.
0.35%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.34%
Woodward, Inc.
0.34%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.33%
F5, Inc.
0.31%
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
0.30%
NiSource, Inc.
0.30%
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
0.30%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.30%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
0.29%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
0.28%
Packaging Corporation of America
0.27%
Frequently asked questions about OSCV and SMMD
How have the OSCV and SMMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, OSCV is up 16.83% year-to-date (YTD), while SMMD has returned 23.09%. That puts SMMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OSCV or SMMD?
Year-to-date, the OSCV ETF saw -$27M in flows, compared to +$907M for SMMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: OSCV or SMMD?
Over the past year, OSCV had a volatility of 12.69%, while SMMD experienced 17.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: OSCV or SMMD?
As of August 5, 2026, OSCV holds $710.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMMD manages $3.70 B.
What sectors do the OSCV and SMMD ETFs invest in?
OSCV leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, SMMD focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OSCV ETF and SMMD ETF?
OSCV top holdings include Arcosa, Inc., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.. SMMD holds in its top three: MKS, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and nVent Electric Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: OSCV or SMMD?
OSCV holds 66 securities with 35.49% of its assets in the top 15. SMMD has 2505 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
