OSCVvsFNDAETF Comparison
VS
Opus Small Cap Value ETF (OSCV) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company Index ETF (FNDA) is part of the US Small Cap segment. OSCV's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FNDA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. OSCV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.25% for FNDA. OSCV is up 16.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$27M in YTD flows. FNDA performs better with 20.32% YTD performance, and -$1.40B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OSCV and FNDA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OSCV vs FNDA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/06/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OSCV FNDA | +1.70%+0.23% | +4.80%+4.71% | +16.25%+20.32% | +18.10%+30.27% | +34.28%+48.18% | +39.55%+51.99% |
| Flows | OSCV FNDA | -$41M+$4M | -$2M-$1.46B | -$27M-$1.40B | -$9M-$1.47B | +$311M-$825M | +$444M+$1.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OSCV FNDA | +10.35%+15.01% | +12.70%+17.10% | +15.59%+19.51% | +17.17%+20.69% |
| Max drawdown | OSCV FNDA | -2.34%-4.32% | -7.80%-9.44% | -22.97%-25.89% | -22.97%-25.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | OSCV FNDA | 22d16d | 59d66d | 436d379d | 436d379d |
Trading data
OSCV | FNDA | |
Last sale 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.94 | $38.22 |
| Previous close 08/06/2026 | $42.80 | $37.76 |
| Consolidated volume 08/06/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OSCV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOSCV | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/7/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OSCV | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.94 | $38.22 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $707.20 M | $9.27 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
OSCV | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | APTUS ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index |
| N° of holdings | 66 | 917 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 17, 2018 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OSCV
USA
89.15%
Other
10.85%
FNDA
USA
98.01%
Other
1.99%
Sectors
OSCV
Finance
37.66%
Industrials
15.02%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.18%
Energy
7.45%
Other
28.69%
FNDA
Finance
25.85%
Industrials
14.7%
Technology
13.98%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.71%
Healthcare
7.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.17%
Other
23.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
OSCV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.49%
FNDA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OSCV
Arcosa, Inc.
2.74%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.73%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
2.72%
nVent Electric Plc
2.67%
Hawkins, Inc.
2.47%
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
2.41%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.38%
PriceSmart, Inc.
2.29%
A10 Networks, Inc.
2.28%
Enterprise Financial Services Corp.
2.26%
The Ensign Group, Inc.
2.17%
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
2.14%
Primerica, Inc.
2.11%
Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
2.08%
Wintrust Financial Corp.
2.04%
FNDA
MKS, Inc.
0.49%
Amkor Technology, Inc.
0.48%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.47%
Victoria's Secret & Co.
0.44%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.43%
Coherent Corp.
0.43%
Entegris, Inc.
0.37%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.36%
Terex Corp.
0.35%
EnerSys
0.33%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.32%
Woodward, Inc.
0.31%
ATI, Inc.
0.31%
ArcBest Corp.
0.31%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.30%
Frequently asked questions about OSCV and FNDA
How have the OSCV and FNDA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 6, 2026, OSCV is up 16.25% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDA has returned 20.32%. That puts FNDA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OSCV or FNDA?
Year-to-date, the OSCV ETF saw -$27M in flows, compared to -$1.40B for FNDA.
Which ETF is more volatile: OSCV or FNDA?
Over the past year, OSCV had a volatility of 12.7%, while FNDA experienced 17.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: OSCV or FNDA?
As of August 6, 2026, OSCV holds $707.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDA manages $9.27 B.
What sectors do the OSCV and FNDA ETFs invest in?
OSCV leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FNDA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OSCV ETF and FNDA ETF?
OSCV top holdings include Arcosa, Inc., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.. FNDA holds in its top three: MKS, Inc., Amkor Technology, Inc. and Lumentum Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OSCV or FNDA?
OSCV holds 66 securities with 35.49% of its assets in the top 15. FNDA has 918 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.68%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
