OPERvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. OPER is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. OPER is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. LQDH performs better with 3.44% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OPER and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OPER vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OPER LQDH | +0.33%+0.06% | +0.97%+1.26% | +3.01%+3.44% | +3.87%+5.09% | +14.49%+23.19% | +21.17%+29.42% |
| Flows | OPER LQDH | +$3M+$28M | +$8M+$97M | -$3M+$27M | +$8M+$88M | -$113M+$346M | -$63M+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OPER LQDH | +0.14%+1.91% | +0.14%+2.55% | +0.18%+3.30% | +0.19%+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | OPER LQDH | n/a-0.60% | n/a-2.26% | n/a-4.48% | n/a-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | OPER LQDH | n/a24d | n/a82d | n/a104d | n/a437d |
Trading data
OPER | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $100.23 | $92.36 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $100.18 | $92.55 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OPER
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOPER | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OPER | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $100.23 | $92.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $117.80 M | $600.46 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
OPER | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Clear Shares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2018 | May 27, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OPER
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
OPER
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Diversification
OPER
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
OPER
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about OPER and LQDH
How have the OPER and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, OPER is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.44%. That puts LQDH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OPER or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the OPER ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: OPER or LQDH?
Over the past year, OPER had a volatility of 0.14%, while LQDH experienced 2.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: OPER or LQDH?
As of October 16, 2026, OPER holds $117.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $600.46 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
