ONOFvsXYLGETF Comparison
VS
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. ONOF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. ONOF is up 8.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. XYLG performs better with 11.44% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ONOF vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF XYLG | -0.82%+0.01% | +3.73%+4.64% | +8.98%+11.44% | +13.26%+17.74% | +41.79%+59.57% | +48.72%+63.27% |
| Flows | ONOF XYLG | --$3M | -$4M-$6M | -$13M-$5M | -$10M+$6M | +$9M-$1M | -$65M+$34M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF XYLG | +12.10%+8.43% | +12.27%+9.76% | +14.34%+12.35% | +14.60%+14.05% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF XYLG | -3.59%-2.17% | -6.75%-6.95% | -21.66%-17.16% | -25.41%-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF XYLG | 19d16d | 107d48d | 205d154d | 756d736d |
Trading data
ONOF | XYLG | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.81 | $29.55 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $40.38 | $29.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ONOF | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ONOF | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.81 | $29.55 |
| 1D performance | +1.06% | +0.78% |
| AuM | $141.18 M | $61.95 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
ONOF | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | CBOE S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | June 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ONOF
Data will be available soon
XYLG
Data will be available soon
Sectors
ONOF
Data will be available soon
XYLG
Data will be available soon
Diversification
ONOF
Data will be available soon
XYLG
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
ONOF
Data will be available soon
XYLG
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ONOF and XYLG
How have the ONOF and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, ONOF is up 8.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has returned 11.44%. That puts XYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to -$5M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or XYLG?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 12.27%, while XYLG experienced 9.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or XYLG?
As of September 11, 2026, ONOF holds $141.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $61.95 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
