Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ONOFvsUSPXETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. ONOF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, USPX's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. ONOF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.03% for USPX. ONOF is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. USPX performs worse with -1.04% YTD performance, and +$54M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and USPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ONOF vs USPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF USPX | -2.13%-2.21% | -1.60%-1.64% | -0.95%-1.04% | +13.04%+22.04% | +46.26%+83.15% | +56.28%+75.55% |
| Flows | ONOF USPX | +$3M+$6M | +$4M+$66M | +$2M+$54M | +$5M+$140M | +$39M+$368M | +$52M+$978M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF USPX | +11.79%+11.61% | +17.24%+18.33% | +14.17%+14.94% | +14.46%+15.36% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF USPX | -3.48%-3.50% | -13.89%-13.90% | -21.66%-19.03% | -25.41%-24.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF USPX | 57d57d | 91d45d | 205d126d | 756d712d |
ONOF | USPX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.19 | $59.11 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $37.20 | $59.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ONOF | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ONOF | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.19 | $59.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $142.62 M | $1.69 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.03% |
ONOF | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 456 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | June 1, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ONOF and USPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ONOF is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while USPX has lost -1.04%. That puts ONOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or USPX?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$54M for USPX.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or USPX?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 17.24%, while USPX experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or USPX?
As of March 10, 2026, ONOF holds $142.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while USPX manages $1.69 B.
What sectors do the ONOF and USPX ETFs invest in?
ONOF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, USPX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the ONOF ETF and USPX ETF?
ONOF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. USPX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONOF or USPX?
ONOF holds 504 securities with 43.08% of its assets in the top 15. USPX has 486 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.07%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
