ONOFvsPTLCETF Comparison
VS
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. ONOF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.6% for PTLC. ONOF is up 8.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. PTLC performs worse with 6.74% YTD performance, and -$284M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and PTLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ONOF vs PTLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF PTLC | -1.17%-1.03% | +3.14%+3.05% | +8.48%+6.74% | +10.14%+8.57% | +50.04%+55.50% | +44.77%+55.59% |
| Flows | ONOF PTLC | --$54M | -$324K-$66M | -$13M-$284M | -$10M-$388M | +$6M-$64M | +$8M+$140M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF PTLC | +11.25%+10.95% | +12.19%+12.17% | +14.26%+12.26% | +14.53%+11.96% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF PTLC | -3.10%-3.07% | -6.75%-8.81% | -21.66%-15.08% | -25.41%-15.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF PTLC | 53d53d | 107d98d | 205d247d | 756d247d |
Trading data
ONOF | PTLC | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.88 | $59.77 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $40.62 | $59.34 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ONOF | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ONOF | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.88 | $59.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $140.53 M | $3.26 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
ONOF | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ONOF
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
ONOF
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
ONOF
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
ONOF
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ONOF and PTLC
How have the ONOF and PTLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, ONOF is up 8.48% year-to-date (YTD), while PTLC has returned 6.74%. That puts ONOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or PTLC?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to -$284M for PTLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or PTLC?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 12.19%, while PTLC experienced 12.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or PTLC?
As of October 23, 2026, ONOF holds $140.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while PTLC manages $3.26 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
