Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ONOFvsILCBETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ONOF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.03% for ILCB. ONOF is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. ILCB performs better with -0.93% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and ILCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ONOF vs ILCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF ILCB | -2.19%-2.22% | -1.88%-1.73% | -1.03%-0.93% | +13.72%+22.98% | +46.26%+83.38% | +54.21%+80.20% |
| Flows | ONOF ILCB | +$3M-$137K | +$4M-$248K | +$2M-$5M | +$5M+$11M | +$39M-$67M | +$52M-$210M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF ILCB | +11.78%+12.03% | +17.22%+18.43% | +14.17%+15.01% | +14.45%+17.15% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF ILCB | -3.48%-3.47% | -13.77%-13.93% | -21.66%-19.10% | -25.41%-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF ILCB | 58d43d | 89d45d | 205d126d | 756d715d |
ONOF | ILCB | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.19 | $92.28 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $37.20 | $93.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ONOF | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ONOF | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.19 | $92.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -1.24% |
| AuM | $142.50 M | $1.16 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.03% |
ONOF | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 497 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ONOF and ILCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ONOF is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCB has lost -0.93%. That puts ILCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or ILCB?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$5M for ILCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or ILCB?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 17.22%, while ILCB experienced 18.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or ILCB?
As of March 11, 2026, ONOF holds $142.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while ILCB manages $1.16 B.
What sectors do the ONOF and ILCB ETFs invest in?
ONOF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ILCB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ONOF ETF and ILCB ETF?
ONOF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ILCB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONOF or ILCB?
ONOF holds 504 securities with 43.08% of its assets in the top 15. ILCB has 535 securities and a top 15 weight of 43%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.