ONOFvsCATHETF Comparison
VS
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is part of the US Large Cap segment. ONOF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.29% for CATH. ONOF is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. CATH performs better with 9.94% YTD performance, and +$139M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and CATH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ONOF vs CATH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF CATH | -1.96%-2.11% | +4.74%+4.50% | +8.05%+9.94% | +13.22%+14.51% | +40.57%+69.74% | +47.70%+71.04% |
| Flows | ONOF CATH | -+$23M | -$4M+$88M | -$13M+$139M | -$10M+$143M | +$9M+$168M | -$63M+$307M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF CATH | +12.52%+12.55% | +12.27%+13.07% | +14.35%+15.33% | +14.60%+17.62% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF CATH | -3.59%-3.55% | -6.75%-9.42% | -21.66%-19.35% | -25.41%-26.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF CATH | 19d16d | 107d92d | 205d126d | 756d713d |
Trading data
ONOF | CATH | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.81 | $90.88 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $40.38 | $90.11 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ONOF | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ONOF | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.81 | $90.88 |
| 1D performance | +1.06% | +0.85% |
| AuM | $139.97 M | $1.35 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
ONOF | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | April 18, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CATH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CATH
Data will be available soon
Diversification
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CATH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CATH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ONOF and CATH
How have the ONOF and CATH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, ONOF is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD), while CATH has returned 9.94%. That puts CATH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or CATH?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$139M for CATH.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or CATH?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 12.27%, while CATH experienced 13.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or CATH?
As of September 10, 2026, ONOF holds $139.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while CATH manages $1.35 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
