Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ONEQvsTUGNETF Comparison
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) belongs to the US All Cap segment. STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) is part of the Alternatives segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ONEQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.21%, versus 0.65% for TUGN. ONEQ is down -2.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$105M in YTD flows. TUGN performs better with -2.06% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONEQ and TUGN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ONEQ vs TUGN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONEQ TUGN | -1.46%-1.24% | -3.54%-3.59% | -2.10%-2.06% | +31.04%+25.50% | +107.92%+75.46% | +78.35%n/a |
| Flows | ONEQ TUGN | -$77M- | -$283M+$6M | -$105M+$2M | +$73M+$24M | +$669M+$42M | +$1.56B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONEQ TUGN | +15.60%+14.89% | +23.23%+21.63% | +19.71%+17.77% | +22.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ONEQ TUGN | -6.07%-6.02% | -16.44%-14.40% | -24.22%-21.93% | -34.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ONEQ TUGN | 42d42d | 45d45d | 191d124d | 807dn/a |
ONEQ | TUGN | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.45 | $24.29 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $89.39 | $24.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ONEQ | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ONEQ | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.45 | $24.29 |
| 1D performance | +0.07% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $9.03 B | $69.19 M |
| E/R | 0.21% | 0.65% |
ONEQ | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Fidelity | STF Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Composite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 799 | 92 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2003 | May 19, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ONEQ and TUGN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ONEQ is down -2.1% year-to-date (YTD), while TUGN has lost -2.06%. That puts TUGN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONEQ or TUGN?
Year-to-date, the ONEQ ETF saw -$105M in flows, compared to +$2M for TUGN.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONEQ or TUGN?
Over the past year, ONEQ had a volatility of 23.23%, while TUGN experienced 21.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONEQ or TUGN?
As of March 11, 2026, ONEQ holds $9.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while TUGN manages $69.19 M.
What sectors do the ONEQ and TUGN ETFs invest in?
ONEQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TUGN focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ONEQ ETF and TUGN ETF?
ONEQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. TUGN holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONEQ or TUGN?
ONEQ holds 995 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. TUGN has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.22%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
