Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFSvsXJRETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is part of the US Small Cap segment. OMFS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XJR's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. OMFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.12% for XJR. OMFS is up 3.06% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. XJR performs worse with 2.64% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFS and XJR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFS vs XJR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFS XJR | -5.33%-6.07% | -1.66%-1.25% | +3.06%+2.64% | +24.61%+17.65% | +40.20%+38.48% | +18.39%+15.24% |
| Flows | OMFS XJR | -$12M+$7M | -$13M+$9M | -$16M+$11M | -$25M+$9M | -$81M+$54M | +$143M+$93M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFS XJR | +17.17%+16.72% | +21.17%+22.39% | +20.21%+20.61% | +21.39%+21.56% |
| Max drawdown | OMFS XJR | -5.71%-6.36% | -12.36%-15.49% | -22.72%-27.00% | -29.04%-27.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFS XJR | 30d29d | 35d46d | 284d409d | 1095d409d |
OMFS | XJR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.82 | $42.82 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $45.73 | $43.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFS | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFS | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.82 | $42.82 |
| 1D performance | -2.00% | -1.97% |
| AuM | $252.87 M | $117.73 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.12% |
OMFS | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 1461 | 514 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | September 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFS and XJR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, OMFS is up 3.06% year-to-date (YTD), while XJR has returned 2.64%. That puts OMFS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFS or XJR?
Year-to-date, the OMFS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to +$11M for XJR.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFS or XJR?
Over the past year, OMFS had a volatility of 21.17%, while XJR experienced 22.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFS or XJR?
As of March 11, 2026, OMFS holds $252.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while XJR manages $117.73 M.
What sectors do the OMFS and XJR ETFs invest in?
OMFS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XJR focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OMFS ETF and XJR ETF?
OMFS top holdings include COMPASS, DANA INC and CONSTELLIUM HOLDCO BV. XJR holds in its top three: US0669224778, ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES and ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFS or XJR?
OMFS holds 1683 securities with 4.24% of its assets in the top 15. XJR has 544 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
