OMFSvsRESMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. OMFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.32% for RESM. OMFS is up 13.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. RESM performs better with 18.03% YTD performance, and +$397K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFS and RESM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OMFS vs RESM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFS RESM | +1.21%+2.23% | -4.74%-2.37% | +13.55%+18.03% | +16.06%n/a | +62.76%n/a | +24.65%n/a |
| Flows | OMFS RESM | +$494K- | -$1M+$2M | -$25M+$397K | -$18M- | -$183M- | +$67M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFS RESM | +11.90%+12.36% | +16.40%n/a | +19.79%n/a | +20.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OMFS RESM | -9.29%-9.03% | -9.29%n/a | -22.72%n/a | -29.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFS RESM | 75d75d | 75dn/a | 284dn/a | 1095dn/a |
Trading data
OMFS | RESM | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $50.05 | $23.50 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $49.78 | $23.46 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RESM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOMFS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
OMFS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.05 | $23.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.55% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $266.62 M | $5.87 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
OMFS | RESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1104 | 998 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
OMFS
USA
94.02%
Other
5.98%
RESM
USA
94.21%
Other
5.79%
Sectors
OMFS
Finance
42.33%
Healthcare
14.69%
Technology
12.42%
Industrials
7.13%
Other
23.43%
RESM
Finance
24.29%
Healthcare
19.31%
Technology
14.58%
Industrials
9.87%
Energy
7.02%
Other
24.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
OMFS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.21%
RESM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.17%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
OMFS
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
1.67%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
1.58%
SSR Mining, Inc.
1.44%
Terreno Realty Corp.
1.19%
Brinker International, Inc.
1.15%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.13%
Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
1.09%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
1.02%
Piper Sandler Cos.
0.93%
Acadian Asset Management, Inc.
0.91%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
0.89%
Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
0.87%
Moelis & Co.
0.81%
WisdomTree, Inc.
0.77%
Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc.
0.76%
RESM
Columbia Short Term Cash Fund
0.63%
JFrog Ltd.
0.58%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.50%
Moog, Inc.
0.50%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.49%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.48%
InterDigital, Inc.
0.47%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.46%
Old National Bancorp
0.45%
Glaukos Corp.
0.45%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.44%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.44%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.44%
Oscar Health, Inc.
0.43%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
0.41%
Frequently asked questions about OMFS and RESM
How have the OMFS and RESM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, OMFS is up 13.55% year-to-date (YTD), while RESM has returned 18.03%. That puts RESM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFS or RESM?
Year-to-date, the OMFS ETF saw -$25M in flows, compared to +$397K for RESM.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFS or RESM?
As of October 30, 2026, OMFS holds $266.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while RESM manages $5.87 M.
What sectors do the OMFS and RESM ETFs invest in?
OMFS leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, RESM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OMFS ETF and RESM ETF?
OMFS top holdings include CareTrust REIT, Inc., FirstCash Holdings, Inc. and SSR Mining, Inc.. RESM holds in its top three: Columbia Short Term Cash Fund, JFrog Ltd. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFS or RESM?
OMFS holds 1106 securities with 16.21% of its assets in the top 15. RESM has 1001 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.17%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
