Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFSvsQVMSETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OMFS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QVMS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. OMFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.15% for QVMS. OMFS is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. QVMS performs better with 1.85% YTD performance, and -$302K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFS and QVMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFS vs QVMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFS QVMS | -5.42%-5.59% | -2.11%-1.11% | +1.05%+1.85% | +22.23%+18.96% | +37.46%+39.16% | +15.49%n/a |
| Flows | OMFS QVMS | -$12M- | -$13M-$344K | -$16M-$302K | -$25M+$31K | -$81M+$57M | +$143M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFS QVMS | +17.36%+16.33% | +21.27%+22.49% | +20.23%+20.45% | +21.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OMFS QVMS | -7.55%-7.49% | -12.36%-15.71% | -22.72%-27.75% | -29.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFS QVMS | 31d30d | 35d49d | 284d380d | 1095dn/a |
OMFS | QVMS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.59 | $28.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $44.82 | $28.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.59 | $28.70 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $247.94 M | $211.24 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.15% |
OMFS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 1461 | 503 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFS and QVMS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFS is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMS has returned 1.85%. That puts QVMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFS or QVMS?
Year-to-date, the OMFS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to -$302K for QVMS.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFS or QVMS?
Over the past year, OMFS had a volatility of 21.27%, while QVMS experienced 22.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFS or QVMS?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFS holds $247.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMS manages $211.24 M.
What sectors do the OMFS and QVMS ETFs invest in?
OMFS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QVMS focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OMFS ETF and QVMS ETF?
OMFS top holdings include COMPASS, DANA INC and CONSTELLIUM HOLDCO BV. QVMS holds in its top three: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, SANMINA CORP and TTM TECHNOLOGIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFS or QVMS?
OMFS holds 1683 securities with 4.24% of its assets in the top 15. QVMS has 539 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.71%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.