Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFSvsESIXETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) is part of the US Small Cap segment. OMFS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ESIX's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. OMFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.12% for ESIX. OMFS is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. ESIX performs worse with -0.38% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFS and ESIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFS vs ESIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFS ESIX | -5.42%-6.73% | -2.11%-2.70% | +1.05%-0.38% | +22.23%+12.35% | +37.46%+32.45% | +15.49%n/a |
| Flows | OMFS ESIX | -$12M- | -$13M- | -$16M- | -$25M-$305K | -$81M+$2M | +$143M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFS ESIX | +17.36%+16.39% | +21.27%+22.30% | +20.23%+20.35% | +21.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OMFS ESIX | -7.55%-8.67% | -12.36%-15.55% | -22.72%-27.34% | -29.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFS ESIX | 31d30d | 35d49d | 284d421d | 1095dn/a |
OMFS | ESIX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.82 | $31.31 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.73 | $31.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFS | ESIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFS | ESIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.82 | $31.31 |
| 1D performance | -2.00% | -1.91% |
| AuM | $247.94 M | $7.05 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.12% |
OMFS | ESIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Scored & Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 1461 | 365 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | January 11, 2022 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFS and ESIX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFS is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while ESIX has lost -0.38%. That puts OMFS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFS or ESIX?
Year-to-date, the OMFS ETF saw -$16M in flows, compared to - for ESIX.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFS or ESIX?
Over the past year, OMFS had a volatility of 21.27%, while ESIX experienced 22.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFS or ESIX?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFS holds $247.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESIX manages $7.05 M.
What sectors do the OMFS and ESIX ETFs invest in?
OMFS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ESIX focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OMFS ETF and ESIX ETF?
OMFS top holdings include COMPASS, DANA INC and CONSTELLIUM HOLDCO BV. ESIX holds in its top three: ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC, INTERDIGITAL and CARETRUST REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFS or ESIX?
OMFS holds 1683 securities with 4.24% of its assets in the top 15. ESIX has 381 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.69%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
