Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFLvsRECSETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OMFL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. OMFL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.15% for RECS. OMFL is up 0.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$325M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.84% YTD performance, and +$282M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFL and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFL vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFL RECS | -1.74%-2.94% | +0.08%-2.73% | +0.15%-1.84% | +16.58%+22.98% | +42.58%+82.47% | +49.22%+95.09% |
| Flows | OMFL RECS | -$148M+$174M | -$365M+$487M | -$325M+$282M | -$965M+$2.28B | +$441M+$4.23B | +$1.59B+$4.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFL RECS | +14.19%+11.63% | +16.77%+17.97% | +14.73%+14.48% | +16.80%+16.55% |
| Max drawdown | OMFL RECS | -3.73%-3.61% | -10.72%-13.84% | -15.62%-18.49% | -22.09%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFL RECS | 15d30d | 37d45d | 133d126d | 560d573d |
OMFL | RECS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.23 | $39.47 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.94 | $40.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.23 | $39.47 |
| 1D performance | -1.15% | -1.57% |
| AuM | $4.33 B | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.15% |
OMFL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 863 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFL and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFL is up 0.15% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.84%. That puts OMFL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFL or RECS?
Year-to-date, the OMFL ETF saw -$325M in flows, compared to +$282M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFL or RECS?
Over the past year, OMFL had a volatility of 16.77%, while RECS experienced 17.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFL or RECS?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFL holds $4.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the OMFL and RECS ETFs invest in?
OMFL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the OMFL ETF and RECS ETF?
OMFL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFL or RECS?
OMFL holds 932 securities with 31.47% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
