Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFLvsJHMLETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OMFL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, JHML's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. OMFL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.32% for JHML. OMFL is up 0.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$325M in YTD flows. JHML performs worse with -0.81% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFL and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFL vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFL JHML | -1.74%-2.77% | +0.08%-0.89% | +0.15%-0.81% | +16.58%+19.54% | +42.58%+67.83% | +49.22%+66.97% |
| Flows | OMFL JHML | -$148M+$20M | -$365M+$26M | -$325M+$22M | -$965M-$17M | +$441M-$38M | +$1.59B+$30M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFL JHML | +14.19%+11.52% | +16.77%+17.54% | +14.73%+14.24% | +16.80%+16.32% |
| Max drawdown | OMFL JHML | -3.73%-4.36% | -10.72%-13.37% | -15.62%-18.02% | -22.09%-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFL JHML | 15d31d | 37d45d | 133d127d | 560d708d |
OMFL | JHML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.06 | $78.82 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.23 | $79.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFL | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFL | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.06 | $78.82 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $4.33 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.32% |
OMFL | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 863 | 712 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFL and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFL is up 0.15% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has lost -0.81%. That puts OMFL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFL or JHML?
Year-to-date, the OMFL ETF saw -$325M in flows, compared to +$22M for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFL or JHML?
Over the past year, OMFL had a volatility of 16.77%, while JHML experienced 17.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFL or JHML?
As of March 12, 2026, OMFL holds $4.33 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the OMFL and JHML ETFs invest in?
OMFL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OMFL ETF and JHML ETF?
OMFL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. JHML holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFL or JHML?
OMFL holds 932 securities with 31.47% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 773 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.75%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
