New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

OMFLvsIWBETF Comparison

ETF 1
OMFL

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.71%
VS
ETF 2
IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

This fund is part of
US Large Cap
-0.64%

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. OMFL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. OMFL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.15% for IWB. OMFL is up 13.73% year-to-date (YTD) with -$519M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 11.47% YTD performance, and -$2.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFL and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

OMFL vs IWB performance and flow charts

Performance

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Cumulative Flows

-500 M-400 M-300 M-200 M-100 M0 MAug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
OMFL
IWB
-2.85%-2.12%
+4.00%+4.66%
+13.73%+11.47%
+17.66%+16.67%
+50.02%+73.95%
+56.54%+75.93%
Flows
OMFL
IWB
-$39M-$168M
-$77M-$423M
-$519M-$2.55B
-$1.00B-$2.18B
-$1.83B-$2.54B
+$1.22B-$2.44B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
OMFL
IWB
+10.51%+12.26%
+12.62%+13.00%
+14.85%+15.23%
+16.57%+17.35%
Max drawdown
OMFL
IWB
-3.11%-3.34%
-7.59%-8.86%
-15.62%-19.16%
-22.09%-25.17%
Max drawdown duration
OMFL
IWB
28d19d
47d76d
133d126d
560d709d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
OMFL
IWB
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 3:13 PM
$69.78
$418.51
Previous close
09/10/2026
$69.21
$414.32
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
OMFL
IWB
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 3:13 PM
Live
Closed
OMFL
IWB
Last price
$69.78
$418.51
1D performance
+0.82%
+1.01%
AuM$4.70 B$48.52 B
E/R0.29%0.15%
Characteristics
OMFL
IWB
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderInvescoiShares
BenchmarkRussell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor IndexRussell 1000 Index
N° of holdings6291011
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 8, 2017May 15, 2000
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

OMFL
USA
96.88%
Other
3.12%
IWB
USA
97.59%
Other
2.41%

Sectors

OMFL
Technology
41%
Healthcare
13.01%
Finance
11.08%
Industrials
10.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.4%
Other
13.67%
IWB
Technology
42.37%
Finance
14.69%
Healthcare
9.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
16.51%
Advertisement

Diversification

OMFL

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.91%
IWB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

40.24%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
OMFL
Apple, Inc.
9.38%
Microsoft Corp.
5.12%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Visa, Inc.
3.00%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.45%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.27%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.65%
Johnson & Johnson
1.52%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.52%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.24%
Lam Research Corp.
1.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.16%
IWB
Apple, Inc.
7.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.83%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.34%
Tesla, Inc.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.15%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about OMFL and IWB

How have the OMFL and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 10, 2026, OMFL is up 13.73% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 11.47%. That puts OMFL better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFL or IWB?

Year-to-date, the OMFL ETF saw -$519M in flows, compared to -$2.55B for IWB.

Which ETF is more volatile: OMFL or IWB?

Over the past year, OMFL had a volatility of 12.62%, while IWB experienced 13%.

Which ETF is bigger: OMFL or IWB?

As of September 10, 2026, OMFL holds $4.70 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.52 B.

What sectors do the OMFL and IWB ETFs invest in?

OMFL leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the OMFL ETF and IWB ETF?

OMFL top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and NVIDIA Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: OMFL or IWB?

OMFL holds 633 securities with 41.91% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.24%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up