Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OMFLvsAFLGETF Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OMFL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, AFLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. OMFL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.55% for AFLG. OMFL is up 1.1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$317M in YTD flows. AFLG performs better with 1.19% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OMFL and AFLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OMFL vs AFLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OMFL AFLG | -2.40%-2.69% | +0.06%+0.50% | +1.10%+1.19% | +16.90%+18.93% | +44.13%+76.98% | +53.57%+78.63% |
| Flows | OMFL AFLG | -$176M+$20M | -$591M+$22M | -$317M+$16M | -$956M+$237M | +$359M+$425M | +$1.60B+$423M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OMFL AFLG | +14.23%+11.51% | +16.74%+17.21% | +14.72%+14.15% | +16.80%+16.21% |
| Max drawdown | OMFL AFLG | -3.60%-3.62% | -10.72%-12.96% | -15.62%-17.58% | -22.09%-23.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | OMFL AFLG | 13d13d | 37d45d | 133d205d | 560d741d |
OMFL | AFLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.94 | $39.59 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.79 | $39.64 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OMFL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OMFL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.94 | $39.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.24% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $4.38 B | $485.53 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.55% |
OMFL | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 863 | 235 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2017 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OMFL and AFLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, OMFL is up 1.1% year-to-date (YTD), while AFLG has returned 1.19%. That puts AFLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OMFL or AFLG?
Year-to-date, the OMFL ETF saw -$317M in flows, compared to +$16M for AFLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: OMFL or AFLG?
Over the past year, OMFL had a volatility of 16.74%, while AFLG experienced 17.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: OMFL or AFLG?
As of March 10, 2026, OMFL holds $4.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while AFLG manages $485.53 M.
What sectors do the OMFL and AFLG ETFs invest in?
OMFL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, AFLG focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the OMFL ETF and AFLG ETF?
OMFL top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. AFLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: OMFL or AFLG?
OMFL holds 932 securities with 31.47% of its assets in the top 15. AFLG has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
