OEFAvsDMXUETF Comparison
ETF 1
OEFA
ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.21%
VS
ETF 2
DMXU
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.21%
ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF (DMXU) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. OEFA's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, DMXU's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. OEFA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.03% for DMXU. OEFA is up 7.96% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. DMXU performs better with 8.01% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OEFA and DMXU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OEFA vs DMXU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OEFA DMXU | +2.88%-1.59% | +3.18%-1.27% | +7.96%+8.01% | +6.63%+9.50% | +58.64%+59.93% | +44.86%+36.61% |
| Flows | OEFA DMXU | --$6M | -$2M-$5M | -$10M-$7M | -$11M-$7M | -$11M-$859K | -$10M+$26M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OEFA DMXU | +10.81%+9.99% | +14.00%+14.09% | +13.99%+14.36% | +16.57%+15.52% |
| Max drawdown | OEFA DMXU | -6.94%-6.32% | -13.29%-11.19% | -13.29%-17.25% | -31.79%-30.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | OEFA DMXU | 77d73d | 149d103d | 149d232d | 561d843d |
Trading data
OEFA | DMXU | |
Last sale | ||
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | ||
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OEFA | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
OEFA | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | – |
| 1D performance | – | – |
| AuM | $34.80 M | $60.03 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
OEFA | DMXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | O'Shares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index | Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Core Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 352 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2015 | September 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OEFA
Japan
18.17%
United Kingdom
13.45%
Switzerland
12.75%
France
12.68%
Germany
7.99%
Netherlands
7.28%
Other
27.69%
DMXU
Japan
24.59%
United Kingdom
14.08%
France
11.59%
Switzerland
9.03%
Netherlands
8.69%
Other
32.03%
Sectors
OEFA
Industrials
25%
Technology
16.38%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.44%
Healthcare
13.2%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.28%
Finance
10.23%
Other
9.48%
DMXU
Finance
27.17%
Technology
15.54%
Industrials
13.83%
Healthcare
9.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.48%
Other
17.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
OEFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.51%
DMXU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
OEFA
ASML Holding NV
4.22%
HSBC Holdings Plc
4.20%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
4.06%
Novartis AG
3.36%
Siemens AG
3.23%
ABB Ltd.
3.14%
Iberdrola SA
2.95%
KEYENCE Corp.
2.95%
Schneider Electric SE
2.94%
Nestlé SA
2.94%
Roche Holding AG
2.91%
Safran SA
2.70%
Atlas Copco AB
2.68%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
2.66%
SAP SE
2.58%
DMXU
ASML Holding NV
5.75%
HSBC Holdings Plc
3.04%
Novartis AG
2.39%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.09%
Allianz SE
1.70%
Schneider Electric SE
1.64%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.61%
TotalEnergies SE
1.46%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.34%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.34%
ABB Ltd.
1.32%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.30%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.27%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.27%
Iberdrola SA
1.25%
Frequently asked questions about OEFA and DMXU
How have the OEFA and DMXU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, OEFA is up 7.96% year-to-date (YTD), while DMXU has returned 8.01%. That puts DMXU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OEFA or DMXU?
Year-to-date, the OEFA ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to -$7M for DMXU.
Which ETF is more volatile: OEFA or DMXU?
Over the past year, OEFA had a volatility of 14%, while DMXU experienced 14.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: OEFA or DMXU?
As of October 27, 2026, OEFA holds $34.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while DMXU manages $60.03 M.
What sectors do the OEFA and DMXU ETFs invest in?
OEFA leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, DMXU focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OEFA ETF and DMXU ETF?
OEFA top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.. DMXU holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Novartis AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: OEFA or DMXU?
OEFA holds 50 securities with 47.51% of its assets in the top 15. DMXU has 455 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
