OBORvsCNQQETF Comparison
VS
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF (OBOR) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. OBOR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, CNQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. OBOR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.75% for CNQQ. OBOR is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$0K in YTD flows. CNQQ performs worse with -12.65% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OBOR and CNQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OBOR vs CNQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OBOR CNQQ | -4.26%-9.05% | +1.56%-20.50% | +0.41%-12.65% | +4.67%-15.32% | +41.55%n/a | +0.15%n/a |
| Flows | OBOR CNQQ | +$1K-$3M | -$0K+$2M | +$0K+$33M | +$0K+$41M | -$1M- | -$5M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OBOR CNQQ | +10.19%+27.56% | +16.25%+26.01% | +13.07%n/a | +13.86%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OBOR CNQQ | -7.15%-20.50% | -13.83%-24.01% | -13.83%n/a | -33.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OBOR CNQQ | 36d92d | 228d107d | 228dn/a | 1418dn/a |
Trading data
OBOR | CNQQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.61 | $19.97 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $26.78 | $20.33 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OBOR | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OBOR | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.61 | $19.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -1.79% |
| AuM | $4.01 M | $38.38 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
OBOR | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure Index | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index |
| N° of holdings | 106 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 7, 2017 | September 25, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OBOR
China
39.61%
Singapore
12.72%
South Africa
10.56%
Kuwait
9.21%
India
7.39%
Other
20.51%
CNQQ
China
99.21%
Other
0.79%
Sectors
OBOR
Non-Energy Materi.
28.23%
Finance
25.05%
Industrials
23.75%
Utilities
13.2%
Energy
8.63%
Other
1.14%
CNQQ
Technology
56.89%
Industrials
14.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.31%
Healthcare
7.23%
Other
11.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
OBOR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.39%
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
OBOR
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
9.98%
Kuwait Finance House KSC
9.04%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
5.61%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
4.42%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
4.29%
PTT Public Co., Ltd.
3.88%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
3.12%
Tata Motors Ltd.
2.91%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
1.98%
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
1.64%
Northam Platinum Holdings Ltd.
1.61%
Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway Co., Ltd.
1.54%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
1.50%
Bank of Ningbo Co., Ltd.
1.44%
Bank of Jiangsu Co., Ltd.
1.43%
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.79%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.42%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.16%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.71%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.31%
Meituan
2.97%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.67%
NetEase, Inc.
2.33%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.08%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.08%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.93%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.92%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.70%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.64%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about OBOR and CNQQ
How have the OBOR and CNQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, OBOR is up 0.41% year-to-date (YTD), while CNQQ has lost -12.65%. That puts OBOR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OBOR or CNQQ?
Year-to-date, the OBOR ETF saw +$0K in flows, compared to +$33M for CNQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: OBOR or CNQQ?
Over the past year, OBOR had a volatility of 16.25%, while CNQQ experienced 26.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: OBOR or CNQQ?
As of October 15, 2026, OBOR holds $4.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNQQ manages $38.38 M.
What sectors do the OBOR and CNQQ ETFs invest in?
OBOR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, CNQQ focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the OBOR ETF and CNQQ ETF?
OBOR top holdings include Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd., Kuwait Finance House KSC and Valterra Platinum Ltd.. CNQQ holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: OBOR or CNQQ?
OBOR holds 106 securities with 54.39% of its assets in the top 15. CNQQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.29%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
