OASCvsSMMDETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. OASC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, SMMD's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.23% for SMMD. OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. SMMD performs better with 20.6% YTD performance, and +$876M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and SMMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs SMMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC SMMD | -4.24%-1.29% | +5.18%+8.22% | +16.05%+20.60% | +28.52%+29.46% | n/a+56.48% | n/a+49.43% |
| Flows | OASC SMMD | +$3M-$283M | +$9M+$423M | +$11M+$876M | +$47M+$1.45B | -+$1.97B | -+$2.47B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC SMMD | +17.77%+17.54% | +17.90%+17.79% | n/a+19.37% | n/a+20.95% |
| Max drawdown | OASC SMMD | -5.06%-4.22% | -7.69%-9.48% | n/a-25.55% | n/a-28.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC SMMD | 28d16d | 40d43d | n/a283d | n/a980d |
Trading data
OASC | SMMD | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 7:29 PM | $34.11 | $89.99 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $34.20 | $89.64 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 7:29 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.11 | $89.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | +0.39% |
| AuM | $89.57 M | $3.60 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.23% |
Characteristics
OASC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 2500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 180 | 2467 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | July 6, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.97%
Other
5.03%
SMMD
USA
95.04%
Other
4.96%
Sectors
OASC
Technology
25.41%
Finance
24.94%
Healthcare
12.33%
Industrials
9.84%
Other
27.48%
SMMD
Finance
23.86%
Industrials
15.48%
Healthcare
14.26%
Technology
13.89%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.19%
Other
24.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.66%
SMMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OASC
Sandisk Corp.
3.54%
CNA Financial Corp.
1.79%
Flex Ltd.
1.74%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.69%
Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.
1.64%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.62%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.61%
Coherent Corp.
1.59%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
MKS, Inc.
1.54%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.49%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.49%
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
1.47%
Synchrony Financial
1.46%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.44%
SMMD
MKS, Inc.
0.40%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.40%
nVent Electric Plc
0.36%
ATI, Inc.
0.35%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.34%
Woodward, Inc.
0.34%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.33%
F5, Inc.
0.31%
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
0.30%
NiSource, Inc.
0.30%
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
0.30%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.30%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
0.29%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
0.28%
Packaging Corporation of America
0.27%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and SMMD
How have the OASC and SMMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD), while SMMD has returned 20.6%. That puts SMMD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or SMMD?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$876M for SMMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or SMMD?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.9%, while SMMD experienced 17.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or SMMD?
As of July 28, 2026, OASC holds $89.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMMD manages $3.60 B.
What sectors do the OASC and SMMD ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SMMD focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and SMMD ETF?
OASC top holdings include Sandisk Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Flex Ltd.. SMMD holds in its top three: MKS, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and nVent Electric Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or SMMD?
OASC holds 182 securities with 25.66% of its assets in the top 15. SMMD has 2505 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
