OASCvsSMLFETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Healthcare. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.15% for SMLF. OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. SMLF performs worse with 15.75% YTD performance, and +$856M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and SMLF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs SMLF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC SMLF | -2.76%-3.99% | -1.19%-0.02% | +16.05%+15.75% | +19.77%+15.99% | n/a+66.46% | n/a+67.26% |
| Flows | OASC SMLF | +$12M+$40M | +$16M+$198M | +$23M+$856M | +$45M+$1.40B | -+$2.49B | -+$2.25B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC SMLF | +14.63%+14.22% | +17.20%+17.35% | n/a+19.90% | n/a+21.15% |
| Max drawdown | OASC SMLF | -6.93%-5.84% | -7.69%-8.74% | n/a-26.10% | n/a-26.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC SMLF | 73d26d | 40d81d | n/a266d | n/a266d |
Trading data
OASC | SMLF | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.15 | $86.12 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.88 | $85.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | SMLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | SMLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.15 | $86.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.94% |
| AuM | $101.51 M | $4.16 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
OASC | SMLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor USD Gross Return |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 890 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | April 28, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
SMLF
USA
93.28%
Other
6.72%
Sectors
OASC
Finance
28.51%
Technology
19.77%
Healthcare
12.53%
Industrials
7.51%
Other
31.67%
SMLF
Finance
21.93%
Technology
17.24%
Healthcare
14.67%
Industrials
13.83%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.45%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.14%
Other
17.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.03%
SMLF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
10.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OASC
New Jersey Resources Corp.
2.13%
CNA Financial Corp.
2.04%
Sandisk Corp.
2.00%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.72%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.70%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.64%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.61%
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
1.57%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.57%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
Synchrony Financial
1.53%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.51%
Gladstone Investment Corp.
1.41%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.32%
SMLF
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.95%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.86%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.83%
Flex Ltd.
0.77%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
Jabil, Inc.
0.74%
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.67%
Tapestry, Inc.
0.66%
Natera, Inc.
0.62%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
0.62%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.59%
Reliance, Inc.
0.55%
Popular, Inc.
0.54%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.51%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.50%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and SMLF
How have the OASC and SMLF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD), while SMLF has returned 15.75%. That puts OASC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or SMLF?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$856M for SMLF.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or SMLF?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.2%, while SMLF experienced 17.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or SMLF?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC holds $101.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMLF manages $4.16 B.
What sectors do the OASC and SMLF ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SMLF focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and SMLF ETF?
OASC top holdings include New Jersey Resources Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Sandisk Corp.. SMLF holds in its top three: EMCOR Group, Inc., Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury.
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or SMLF?
OASC holds 169 securities with 25.03% of its assets in the top 15. SMLF has 891 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.16%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
