OASCvsSCHAETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Healthcare. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.03% for SCHA. OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. SCHA performs better with 19.17% YTD performance, and -$441M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and SCHA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs SCHA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC SCHA | -2.76%-2.75% | -1.19%-1.62% | +16.05%+19.17% | +19.77%+22.29% | n/a+63.31% | n/a+41.84% |
| Flows | OASC SCHA | +$12M-$13M | +$16M-$226M | +$23M-$441M | +$45M-$514M | -+$30M | -+$347M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC SCHA | +14.63%+18.96% | +17.20%+19.22% | n/a+20.91% | n/a+22.19% |
| Max drawdown | OASC SCHA | -6.93%-9.07% | -7.69%-9.52% | n/a-27.23% | n/a-30.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC SCHA | 73d73d | 40d78d | n/a289d | n/a1072d |
Trading data
OASC | SCHA | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.15 | $33.79 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.88 | $33.65 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.15 | $33.79 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.42% |
| AuM | $101.51 M | $22.43 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
OASC | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 1691 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
SCHA
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
Sectors
OASC
Finance
28.51%
Technology
19.77%
Healthcare
12.53%
Industrials
7.51%
Other
31.67%
SCHA
Finance
23.91%
Technology
18.3%
Healthcare
15.92%
Industrials
12.27%
Other
29.61%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.03%
SCHA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
10.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OASC
New Jersey Resources Corp.
2.13%
CNA Financial Corp.
2.04%
Sandisk Corp.
2.00%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.72%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.70%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.64%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.61%
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
1.57%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.57%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
Synchrony Financial
1.53%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.51%
Gladstone Investment Corp.
1.41%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.32%
SCHA
Sandisk Corp.
4.06%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
1.17%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.82%
ATI, Inc.
0.56%
MKS, Inc.
0.46%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.42%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.39%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.37%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.35%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.34%
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
0.33%
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
0.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.31%
Rocket Cos., Inc.
0.29%
Samsara, Inc.
0.29%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and SCHA
How have the OASC and SCHA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHA has returned 19.17%. That puts SCHA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or SCHA?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to -$441M for SCHA.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or SCHA?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.2%, while SCHA experienced 19.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or SCHA?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC holds $101.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHA manages $22.43 B.
What sectors do the OASC and SCHA ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SCHA focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and SCHA ETF?
OASC top holdings include New Jersey Resources Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Sandisk Corp.. SCHA holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., Lumentum Holdings, Inc. and Revolution Medicines, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or SCHA?
OASC holds 169 securities with 25.03% of its assets in the top 15. SCHA has 1693 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.47%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OASC & SCHA
Small-Cap Funds Outperform Their Large-Cap Peers
July 24, 2023
SCHA
Small Cap ETFs Among the Week’s Top Performers
July 3, 2023
SCHA
Advertisement
Advertisement
