OASCvsFSMDETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. OASC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, FSMD's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.15% for FSMD. OASC is up 16.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. FSMD performs worse with 16.25% YTD performance, and +$284M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and FSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs FSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC FSMD | -3.99%-1.33% | +4.43%+4.89% | +16.36%+16.25% | +28.85%+22.37% | n/a+53.97% | n/a+62.97% |
| Flows | OASC FSMD | +$3M+$26M | +$10M+$56M | +$11M+$284M | +$47M+$513M | -+$1.87B | -+$1.92B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC FSMD | +17.89%+16.18% | +17.93%+15.41% | n/a+17.05% | n/a+18.27% |
| Max drawdown | OASC FSMD | -4.81%-4.61% | -7.69%-8.28% | n/a-22.27% | n/a-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC FSMD | 27d24d | 40d43d | n/a289d | n/a289d |
Trading data
OASC | FSMD | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.20 | $50.96 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $34.20 | $50.92 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.20 | $50.96 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $89.80 M | $2.51 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
OASC | FSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 180 | 589 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | February 26, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.97%
Other
5.03%
FSMD
USA
95.61%
Other
4.39%
Sectors
OASC
Technology
25.41%
Finance
24.94%
Healthcare
12.33%
Industrials
9.84%
Other
27.48%
FSMD
Finance
22.27%
Technology
18.93%
Industrials
16.61%
Healthcare
11.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.74%
Other
22.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.66%
FSMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OASC
Sandisk Corp.
3.54%
CNA Financial Corp.
1.79%
Flex Ltd.
1.74%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.69%
Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.
1.64%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.62%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.61%
Coherent Corp.
1.59%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
MKS, Inc.
1.54%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.49%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.49%
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
1.47%
Synchrony Financial
1.46%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.44%
FSMD
Sandisk Corp.
3.85%
Ciena Corp.
0.95%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.92%
Coherent Corp.
0.85%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.83%
Flex Ltd.
0.82%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.55%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.52%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
0.48%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
0.48%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.46%
Tapestry, Inc.
0.46%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.43%
MKS, Inc.
0.42%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.42%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and FSMD
How have the OASC and FSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, OASC is up 16.36% year-to-date (YTD), while FSMD has returned 16.25%. That puts OASC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or FSMD?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$284M for FSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or FSMD?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.93%, while FSMD experienced 15.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or FSMD?
As of July 27, 2026, OASC holds $89.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSMD manages $2.51 B.
What sectors do the OASC and FSMD ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FSMD focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and FSMD ETF?
OASC top holdings include Sandisk Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Flex Ltd.. FSMD holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., Ciena Corp. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or FSMD?
OASC holds 182 securities with 25.66% of its assets in the top 15. FSMD has 590 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
