OASCvsESMLETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.17% for ESML. OASC is up 17.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$21M in YTD flows. ESML performs worse with 16.14% YTD performance, and +$334M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and ESML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs ESML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC ESML | +1.20%+1.12% | +0.79%-1.48% | +17.28%+16.14% | +18.83%+15.79% | n/a+75.04% | n/a+38.09% |
| Flows | OASC ESML | +$4M-$84M | +$11M-$78M | +$21M+$334M | +$29M+$330M | -+$603M | -+$947M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC ESML | +13.32%+13.67% | +16.63%+16.35% | n/a+19.47% | n/a+21.19% |
| Max drawdown | OASC ESML | -5.37%-8.35% | -7.69%-9.05% | n/a-26.61% | n/a-28.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC ESML | 72d71d | 40d46d | n/a296d | n/a980d |
Trading data
OASC | ESML | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.50 | $53.33 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $34.37 | $53.01 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.50 | $53.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.38% | +0.60% |
| AuM | $100.85 M | $2.70 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.17% |
Characteristics
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 150 | 909 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | April 10, 2018 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
89.36%
Other
10.64%
ESML
USA
95.64%
Other
4.36%
Sectors
OASC
Finance
24.72%
Healthcare
15.11%
Technology
12.99%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.24%
Industrials
8.18%
Other
30.77%
ESML
Finance
22.04%
Healthcare
15.23%
Technology
15.1%
Industrials
13.93%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.12%
Other
26.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.72%
ESML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.06%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
OASC
New Jersey Resources Corp.
2.41%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
2.31%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.27%
Hasbro, Inc.
2.13%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.77%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.74%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.69%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.58%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.57%
Globus Medical, Inc.
1.46%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.45%
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
1.41%
1st Source Corp.
1.40%
Northern Trust Corp.
1.30%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
1.23%
ESML
Moderna, Inc.
0.74%
Assurant, Inc.
0.62%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.57%
Ovintiv, Inc.
0.46%
ONE Gas, Inc.
0.39%
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.38%
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
0.36%
Trimble, Inc.
0.33%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.32%
Nutanix, Inc.
0.32%
Invesco Ltd.
0.32%
The Clorox Co.
0.32%
Dynatrace, Inc.
0.32%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
0.31%
Unum Group
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and ESML
How have the OASC and ESML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, OASC is up 17.28% year-to-date (YTD), while ESML has returned 16.14%. That puts OASC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or ESML?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$21M in flows, compared to +$334M for ESML.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or ESML?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 16.63%, while ESML experienced 16.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or ESML?
As of October 27, 2026, OASC holds $100.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESML manages $2.70 B.
What sectors do the OASC and ESML ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, ESML focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and ESML ETF?
OASC top holdings include New Jersey Resources Corp., Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. and Royalty Pharma Plc. ESML holds in its top three: Moderna, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and US Foods Holding Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or ESML?
OASC holds 150 securities with 25.72% of its assets in the top 15. ESML has 910 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.06%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
