OASCvsESMLETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Healthcare. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.17% for ESML. OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. ESML performs better with 16.74% YTD performance, and +$411M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and ESML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs ESML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC ESML | -2.76%-3.56% | -1.19%+2.33% | +16.05%+16.74% | +19.77%+20.88% | n/a+58.15% | n/a+43.94% |
| Flows | OASC ESML | +$12M-$7M | +$16M+$368M | +$23M+$411M | +$45M+$416M | -+$636M | -+$1.10B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC ESML | +14.63%+15.76% | +17.20%+16.92% | n/a+19.67% | n/a+21.24% |
| Max drawdown | OASC ESML | -6.93%-5.69% | -7.69%-9.05% | n/a-26.61% | n/a-28.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC ESML | 73d25d | 40d46d | n/a296d | n/a980d |
Trading data
OASC | ESML | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.15 | $53.79 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $33.88 | $53.41 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.15 | $53.79 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.71% |
| AuM | $101.51 M | $2.80 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.17% |
Characteristics
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 901 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | April 10, 2018 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
ESML
USA
96.59%
Other
3.41%
Sectors
OASC
Finance
28.51%
Technology
19.77%
Healthcare
12.53%
Industrials
7.51%
Other
31.67%
ESML
Finance
22.56%
Technology
16.47%
Healthcare
14.46%
Industrials
13.98%
Other
32.53%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.03%
ESML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.94%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OASC
New Jersey Resources Corp.
2.13%
CNA Financial Corp.
2.04%
Sandisk Corp.
2.00%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.72%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.70%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.64%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.61%
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
1.57%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.57%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
Synchrony Financial
1.53%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.51%
Gladstone Investment Corp.
1.41%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.32%
ESML
Sandisk Corp.
2.76%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.55%
Assurant, Inc.
0.50%
Ovintiv, Inc.
0.43%
ATI, Inc.
0.40%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.39%
nVent Electric Plc
0.37%
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
0.36%
Woodward, Inc.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.32%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
0.31%
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
0.31%
Moderna, Inc.
0.31%
Brixmor Property Group, Inc.
0.31%
East West Bancorp, Inc.
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and ESML
How have the OASC and ESML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD), while ESML has returned 16.74%. That puts ESML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or ESML?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$411M for ESML.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or ESML?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.2%, while ESML experienced 16.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or ESML?
As of September 11, 2026, OASC holds $101.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESML manages $2.80 B.
What sectors do the OASC and ESML ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ESML focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and ESML ETF?
OASC top holdings include New Jersey Resources Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Sandisk Corp.. ESML holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., US Foods Holding Corp. and Assurant, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or ESML?
OASC holds 169 securities with 25.03% of its assets in the top 15. ESML has 904 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.94%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
