OASCvsESMLETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. OASC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, ESML's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. OASC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.38%, versus 0.17% for ESML. OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. ESML performs better with 17.78% YTD performance, and +$412M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OASC and ESML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OASC vs ESML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OASC ESML | -4.24%-2.82% | +5.18%+6.45% | +16.05%+17.78% | +28.52%+27.32% | n/a+50.88% | n/a+45.75% |
| Flows | OASC ESML | +$3M+$11M | +$9M+$383M | +$11M+$412M | +$47M+$419M | -+$656M | -+$1.16B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OASC ESML | +17.77%+16.40% | +17.90%+17.10% | n/a+19.63% | n/a+21.23% |
| Max drawdown | OASC ESML | -5.06%-4.25% | -7.69%-9.05% | n/a-26.61% | n/a-28.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | OASC ESML | 28d28d | 40d46d | n/a296d | n/a980d |
Trading data
OASC | ESML | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.12 | $53.92 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $34.20 | $53.93 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OASC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.12 | $53.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $89.57 M | $2.83 B |
| E/R | 1.38% | 0.17% |
Characteristics
OASC | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 180 | 904 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2024 | April 10, 2018 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OASC
USA
94.97%
Other
5.03%
ESML
USA
96.57%
Other
3.43%
Sectors
OASC
Technology
25.41%
Finance
24.94%
Healthcare
12.33%
Industrials
9.84%
Other
27.48%
ESML
Finance
21.07%
Technology
19.21%
Industrials
15.06%
Healthcare
13.51%
Other
31.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
OASC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.66%
ESML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
10.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OASC
Sandisk Corp.
3.54%
CNA Financial Corp.
1.79%
Flex Ltd.
1.74%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.69%
Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc.
1.64%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.62%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.61%
Coherent Corp.
1.59%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.56%
MKS, Inc.
1.54%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
1.49%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.49%
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
1.47%
Synchrony Financial
1.46%
Crown Holdings, Inc.
1.44%
ESML
Sandisk Corp.
4.67%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.53%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.45%
Assurant, Inc.
0.45%
nVent Electric Plc
0.42%
ATI, Inc.
0.41%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.39%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.39%
Woodward, Inc.
0.37%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.37%
MKS, Inc.
0.36%
Moderna, Inc.
0.36%
Ovintiv, Inc.
0.35%
Onto Innovation, Inc.
0.34%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
0.32%
Frequently asked questions about OASC and ESML
How have the OASC and ESML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, OASC is up 16.05% year-to-date (YTD), while ESML has returned 17.78%. That puts ESML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OASC or ESML?
Year-to-date, the OASC ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$412M for ESML.
Which ETF is more volatile: OASC or ESML?
Over the past year, OASC had a volatility of 17.9%, while ESML experienced 17.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: OASC or ESML?
As of July 28, 2026, OASC holds $89.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESML manages $2.83 B.
What sectors do the OASC and ESML ETFs invest in?
OASC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ESML focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OASC ETF and ESML ETF?
OASC top holdings include Sandisk Corp., CNA Financial Corp. and Flex Ltd.. ESML holds in its top three: Sandisk Corp., US Foods Holding Corp. and Carpenter Technology Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OASC or ESML?
OASC holds 182 securities with 25.66% of its assets in the top 15. ESML has 907 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
