OALCvsPBPETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is part of the Options Strategies segment. OALC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, PBP's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. OALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.29% for PBP. OALC is up 15.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$38M in YTD flows. PBP performs worse with 10.39% YTD performance, and +$46M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OALC and PBP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OALC vs PBP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OALC PBP | -2.93%+1.02% | +1.76%+4.84% | +15.88%+10.39% | +19.38%+18.10% | +80.56%+45.62% | n/a+48.21% |
| Flows | OALC PBP | +$9M+$14M | +$18M+$33M | +$38M+$46M | +$66M+$71M | +$144M+$275M | -+$205M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OALC PBP | +13.30%+5.98% | +14.39%+7.32% | +15.07%+10.34% | n/a+11.37% |
| Max drawdown | OALC PBP | -4.54%-1.21% | -8.61%-5.24% | -17.48%-15.51% | n/a-18.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | OALC PBP | 35d9d | 72d63d | 133d240d | n/a679d |
Trading data
OALC | PBP | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.08 | $23.41 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $41.07 | $23.40 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OALC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOALC | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OALC | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.08 | $23.41 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $263.49 M | $385.60 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
OALC | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 238 | 500 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2021 | December 20, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OALC
USA
97.87%
Other
2.13%
PBP
USA
98.14%
Other
1.86%
Sectors
OALC
Technology
42.89%
Finance
13.62%
Industrials
9.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.62%
Healthcare
7.72%
Other
17.96%
PBP
Technology
44.19%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.14%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
15.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
OALC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.55%
PBP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OALC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Microsoft Corp.
5.84%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.22%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.39%
Broadcom Inc.
2.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.69%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.59%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.46%
Visa, Inc.
1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.23%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.12%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.12%
PBP
Apple, Inc.
7.95%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
4.64%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.06%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.53%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.49%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.48%
Tesla, Inc.
1.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.33%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.12%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about OALC and PBP
How have the OALC and PBP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, OALC is up 15.88% year-to-date (YTD), while PBP has returned 10.39%. That puts OALC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OALC or PBP?
Year-to-date, the OALC ETF saw +$38M in flows, compared to +$46M for PBP.
Which ETF is more volatile: OALC or PBP?
Over the past year, OALC had a volatility of 14.39%, while PBP experienced 7.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: OALC or PBP?
As of September 17, 2026, OALC holds $263.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBP manages $385.60 M.
What sectors do the OALC and PBP ETFs invest in?
OALC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, PBP focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OALC ETF and PBP ETF?
OALC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.. PBP holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OALC or PBP?
OALC holds 241 securities with 39.55% of its assets in the top 15. PBP has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OALC & PBP
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
PBP
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 1: A Grand Overview
November 1, 2023
PBP
Advertisement
Advertisement
