Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OALCvsFBUFETF Comparison
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. OALC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, FBUF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. OALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.52% for FBUF. OALC is down -0.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. FBUF performs worse with -1.1% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OALC and FBUF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OALC vs FBUF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OALC FBUF | -2.13%-1.33% | -0.96%-0.41% | -0.03%-1.10% | +25.55%+17.01% | +73.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | OALC FBUF | +$5M+$12K | +$14M+$3M | +$9M+$2M | +$52M+$8M | +$118M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OALC FBUF | +12.72%+8.11% | +17.20%+10.58% | +14.47%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | OALC FBUF | -3.59%-2.91% | -12.16%-7.83% | -17.48%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OALC FBUF | 42d39d | 46d59d | 133dn/a | n/an/a |
OALC | FBUF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.79 | $30.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $34.82 | $30.64 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
OALC | FBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.79 | $30.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.41% |
| AuM | $201.67 M | $19.06 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.52% |
OALC | FBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 198 | 141 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2021 | April 9, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OALC and FBUF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, OALC is down -0.03% year-to-date (YTD), while FBUF has lost -1.1%. That puts OALC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OALC or FBUF?
Year-to-date, the OALC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$2M for FBUF.
Which ETF is more volatile: OALC or FBUF?
Over the past year, OALC had a volatility of 17.2%, while FBUF experienced 10.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: OALC or FBUF?
As of March 11, 2026, OALC holds $201.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while FBUF manages $19.06 M.
What sectors do the OALC and FBUF ETFs invest in?
OALC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, FBUF focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the OALC ETF and FBUF ETF?
OALC top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC. FBUF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: OALC or FBUF?
OALC holds 201 securities with 38.93% of its assets in the top 15. FBUF has 146 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.44%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
