OAEMvsXCEMETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Columbia EM ex-China ETF (XCEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. OAEM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.22%, versus 0.16% for XCEM. OAEM is up 34.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$25M in YTD flows. XCEM performs better with 34.72% YTD performance, and +$356M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OAEM and XCEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OAEM vs XCEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OAEM XCEM | +4.56%+7.49% | -0.61%-2.28% | +34.35%+34.72% | +53.54%+56.18% | +79.99%+95.98% | n/a+72.64% |
| Flows | OAEM XCEM | -+$15M | -$1M+$111M | +$25M+$356M | +$39M+$293M | +$56M+$917M | -+$1.25B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OAEM XCEM | +29.38%+32.08% | +23.23%+25.43% | +17.76%+18.47% | n/a+17.17% |
| Max drawdown | OAEM XCEM | -13.75%-17.06% | -14.65%-17.06% | -15.70%-17.68% | n/a-28.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | OAEM XCEM | 70d71d | 57d71d | 106d251d | n/a1016d |
Trading data
OAEM | XCEM | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.28 | $51.21 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $48.84 | $50.85 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAEM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOAEM | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OAEM | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.28 | $51.21 |
| 1D performance | +0.89% | +0.71% |
| AuM | $131.40 M | $2.10 B |
| E/R | 1.22% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
OAEM | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI Beta Thematic Emerging Markets ex-China Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 476 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 15, 2022 | September 2, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OAEM
Taiwan
35.43%
Republic of Korea
18.76%
India
11.06%
Other
34.75%
XCEM
Taiwan
34.59%
Republic of Korea
24.73%
India
14.65%
Other
26.03%
Sectors
OAEM
Technology
38.39%
Finance
27.57%
Industrials
10.79%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.38%
Other
15.87%
XCEM
Technology
46.42%
Finance
19.72%
Industrials
8.61%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.92%
Other
17.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
OAEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.14%
XCEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OAEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.19%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.33%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
3.73%
SinoPac Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.
3.44%
Accton Technology Corp.
2.74%
Promotora y Operadora de Infraestructura SA
2.42%
EVA Airways Corp.
2.39%
Magyar Telekom Telecommunications Plc
2.37%
Yuanta Financial Holding Co. Ltd.
2.22%
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd.
2.18%
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
2.15%
Credicorp Ltd.
2.13%
ADATA Technology Co., Ltd.
2.04%
Ultrapar Participaçoes SA
2.03%
XCEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.17%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.05%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.35%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.41%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.38%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.07%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.03%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.90%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
0.89%
US19766H2397
0.88%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.85%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.84%
International Holding Co. PJSC
0.83%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.81%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
0.74%
Frequently asked questions about OAEM and XCEM
How have the OAEM and XCEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, OAEM is up 34.35% year-to-date (YTD), while XCEM has returned 34.72%. That puts XCEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OAEM or XCEM?
Year-to-date, the OAEM ETF saw +$25M in flows, compared to +$356M for XCEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: OAEM or XCEM?
Over the past year, OAEM had a volatility of 23.23%, while XCEM experienced 25.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: OAEM or XCEM?
As of August 31, 2026, OAEM holds $131.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while XCEM manages $2.10 B.
What sectors do the OAEM and XCEM ETFs invest in?
OAEM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, XCEM focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OAEM ETF and XCEM ETF?
OAEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. XCEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OAEM or XCEM?
OAEM holds 58 securities with 58.14% of its assets in the top 15. XCEM has 479 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OAEM & XCEM
Advertisement
