Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NZUSvsLGHETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) is part of the segment. NZUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Real Estate and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, LGH's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NZUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 1% for LGH. NZUS is down -6.82% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. LGH performs better with -2.44% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZUS and LGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NZUS vs LGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZUS LGH | -2.04%-3.22% | -5.96%-3.58% | -6.82%-2.44% | +16.17%+25.08% | +67.31%+84.57% | n/a+76.39% |
| Flows | NZUS LGH | --$6M | --$9M | --$9M | -$1M+$20M | -$114M+$104M | -+$238M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZUS LGH | +12.65%+16.10% | +19.20%+17.88% | +15.95%+16.87% | n/a+16.75% |
| Max drawdown | NZUS LGH | -8.01%-5.38% | -14.25%-11.27% | -20.83%-18.42% | n/a-29.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZUS LGH | 78d58d | 45d48d | 198d206d | n/a806d |
NZUS | LGH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.43 | $58.68 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.69 | $59.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NZUS | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NZUS | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.43 | $58.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.77% | -0.90% |
| AuM | $2.68 M | $556.42 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 1% |
NZUS | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 144 | 393 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 21, 2022 | October 7, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NZUS and LGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NZUS is down -6.82% year-to-date (YTD), while LGH has lost -2.44%. That puts LGH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZUS or LGH?
Year-to-date, the NZUS ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$9M for LGH.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZUS or LGH?
Over the past year, NZUS had a volatility of 19.2%, while LGH experienced 17.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZUS or LGH?
As of March 13, 2026, NZUS holds $2.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGH manages $556.42 M.
What sectors do the NZUS and LGH ETFs invest in?
NZUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Real Estate and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LGH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NZUS ETF and LGH ETF?
NZUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LGH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NZUS or LGH?
NZUS holds 149 securities with 57.66% of its assets in the top 15. LGH has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
