NZACvsURTHETF Comparison
ETF 1
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the segment. iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. NZAC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, URTH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NZAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.24% for URTH. NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$457K in YTD flows. URTH performs better with 11.85% YTD performance, and +$1.04B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and URTH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NZAC vs URTH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC URTH | +0.01%+0.76% | +0.54%+1.27% | +8.17%+11.85% | +10.67%+15.78% | +69.54%+77.20% | +54.93%+70.26% |
| Flows | NZAC URTH | -+$476M | -+$435M | -$457K+$1.04B | -$457K+$1.59B | -$129M+$3.44B | +$9M+$4.58B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC URTH | +10.83%+10.88% | +12.29%+13.03% | +12.63%+14.33% | +14.28%+16.25% |
| Max drawdown | NZAC URTH | -2.99%-3.23% | -9.86%-9.09% | -15.87%-16.96% | -27.40%-26.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC URTH | 64d64d | 76d48d | 86d101d | 763d713d |
Trading data
NZAC | URTH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.95 | $206.34 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.51 | $208.11 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NZAC | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NZAC | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.95 | $206.34 |
| 1D performance | -1.21% | -0.85% |
| AuM | $193.44 M | $8.64 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.24% |
Characteristics
NZAC | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index | MSCI World Index |
| N° of holdings | 593 | 1242 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 25, 2014 | January 10, 2012 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NZAC
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
URTH
USA
70.4%
Other
29.6%
Sectors
NZAC
Technology
40.62%
Finance
23.74%
Healthcare
9.05%
Industrials
8.5%
Other
18.09%
URTH
Technology
35.69%
Finance
18.01%
Industrials
9.57%
Healthcare
9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.48%
Other
19.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.64%
URTH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Tesla, Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Equinix, Inc.
0.98%
URTH
NVIDIA Corp.
5.53%
Apple, Inc.
5.07%
Microsoft Corp.
3.90%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.17%
Broadcom Inc.
1.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.37%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.18%
Tesla, Inc.
1.15%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.03%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.01%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.83%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.77%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about NZAC and URTH
How have the NZAC and URTH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD), while URTH has returned 11.85%. That puts URTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or URTH?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$457K in flows, compared to +$1.04B for URTH.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or URTH?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 12.29%, while URTH experienced 13.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or URTH?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC holds $193.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while URTH manages $8.64 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and URTH ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, URTH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and URTH ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. URTH holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or URTH?
NZAC holds 600 securities with 33.64% of its assets in the top 15. URTH has 1253 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.99%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NZAC & URTH
Advertisement
