NZACvsKLMTETF Comparison
ETF 1
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the segment. Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. NZAC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, KLMT's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NZAC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.1% for KLMT. NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$457K in YTD flows. KLMT performs better with 11.99% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and KLMT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NZAC vs KLMT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC KLMT | +0.01%+0.13% | +0.54%+1.10% | +8.17%+11.99% | +10.67%+15.78% | +69.54%n/a | +54.93%n/a |
| Flows | NZAC KLMT | -- | -+$2M | -$457K+$5M | -$457K-$9M | -$129M- | +$9M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC KLMT | +10.83%+11.69% | +12.29%+13.62% | +12.63%n/a | +14.28%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NZAC KLMT | -2.99%-2.76% | -9.86%-10.06% | -15.87%n/a | -27.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC KLMT | 64d64d | 76d50d | 86dn/a | 763dn/a |
Trading data
NZAC | KLMT | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.95 | $34.56 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.51 | $34.89 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NZAC | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NZAC | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.95 | $34.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.21% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $193.44 M | $1.57 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
NZAC | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index | MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 593 | 499 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 25, 2014 | June 26, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NZAC
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
KLMT
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
Sectors
NZAC
Technology
40.62%
Finance
23.74%
Healthcare
9.05%
Industrials
8.5%
Other
18.09%
KLMT
Technology
37.83%
Finance
19.59%
Industrials
9.26%
Healthcare
8.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.02%
Other
17.05%
Advertisement
Diversification
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.64%
KLMT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Tesla, Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Equinix, Inc.
0.98%
KLMT
NVIDIA Corp.
5.10%
Apple, Inc.
4.48%
Microsoft Corp.
3.47%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.40%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.13%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.30%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.04%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.00%
Tesla, Inc.
0.97%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.94%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.77%
Frequently asked questions about NZAC and KLMT
How have the NZAC and KLMT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD), while KLMT has returned 11.99%. That puts KLMT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or KLMT?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$457K in flows, compared to +$5M for KLMT.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or KLMT?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 12.29%, while KLMT experienced 13.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or KLMT?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC holds $193.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while KLMT manages $1.57 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and KLMT ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, KLMT focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and KLMT ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. KLMT holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or KLMT?
NZAC holds 600 securities with 33.64% of its assets in the top 15. KLMT has 500 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.26%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
