Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NZACvsKLMTETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. NZAC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.1% for KLMT. NZAC is down -3.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. KLMT performs better with -1.71% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and KLMT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NZAC vs KLMT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC KLMT | -3.86%-4.29% | -3.30%-0.97% | -3.98%-1.71% | +19.29%+21.99% | +63.00%n/a | +50.64%n/a |
| Flows | NZAC KLMT | -$9M- | -$9M- | -$9M- | -$5M-$3M | -$140M- | +$13M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC KLMT | +10.86%+12.42% | +13.99%+16.97% | +12.17%n/a | +13.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NZAC KLMT | -5.96%-6.12% | -12.40%-13.65% | -15.87%n/a | -27.40%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC KLMT | 44d16d | 37d45d | 86dn/a | 763dn/a |
NZAC | KLMT | |
Last sale 3/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.66 | $30.39 |
| Previous close 03/13/2026 | $41.08 | $30.63 |
| Consolidated volume 03/13/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NZAC | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NZAC | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.66 | $30.39 |
| 1D performance | +1.42% | -0.76% |
| AuM | $164.59 M | $1.38 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.1% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NZAC and KLMT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NZAC is down -3.98% year-to-date (YTD), while KLMT has lost -1.71%. That puts KLMT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or KLMT?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to - for KLMT.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or KLMT?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 13.99%, while KLMT experienced 16.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or KLMT?
As of March 13, 2026, NZAC holds $164.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while KLMT manages $1.38 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and KLMT ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, KLMT focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and KLMT ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. KLMT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or KLMT?
NZAC holds 677 securities with 31.99% of its assets in the top 15. KLMT has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.44%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
