Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NZACvsGLOFETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. NZAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.2% for GLOF. NZAC is down -3.11% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. GLOF performs better with -0% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and GLOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NZAC vs GLOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC GLOF | -3.15%-3.19% | -2.45%+0.53% | -3.11%-0.00% | +18.93%+24.58% | +64.48%+76.44% | +52.66%+65.93% |
| Flows | NZAC GLOF | -$9M+$11M | -$9M+$14M | -$9M+$14M | -$5M+$30M | -$140M-$12M | +$13M+$16M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC GLOF | +10.72%+12.28% | +14.01%+16.14% | +12.17%+13.47% | +13.92%+15.07% |
| Max drawdown | NZAC GLOF | -5.11%-5.13% | -12.40%-13.04% | -15.87%-16.08% | -27.40%-24.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC GLOF | 43d15d | 37d37d | 86d85d | 763d708d |
NZAC | GLOF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.08 | $52.38 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.48 | $52.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NZAC | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NZAC | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.08 | $52.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.97% | -0.94% |
| AuM | $166.08 M | $166.16 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NZAC and GLOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, NZAC is down -3.11% year-to-date (YTD), while GLOF has lost -0%. That puts GLOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or GLOF?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$14M for GLOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or GLOF?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 14.01%, while GLOF experienced 16.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or GLOF?
As of March 12, 2026, NZAC holds $166.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLOF manages $166.16 M.
What sectors do the NZAC and GLOF ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GLOF focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and GLOF ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GLOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or GLOF?
NZAC holds 677 securities with 31.99% of its assets in the top 15. GLOF has 646 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.94%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
