NZACvsCRBNETF Comparison
ETF 1
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the segment. iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. NZAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.2% for CRBN. NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$457K in YTD flows. CRBN performs better with 10.69% YTD performance, and +$87M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and CRBN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NZAC vs CRBN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC CRBN | +0.01%-0.08% | +0.54%+0.40% | +8.17%+10.69% | +10.67%+14.19% | +69.54%+76.58% | +54.93%+64.09% |
| Flows | NZAC CRBN | -+$26M | -+$38M | -$457K+$87M | -$457K+$30M | -$129M-$161M | +$9M-$316M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC CRBN | +10.83%+11.86% | +12.29%+14.03% | +12.63%+14.40% | +14.28%+16.05% |
| Max drawdown | NZAC CRBN | -2.99%-3.07% | -9.86%-10.24% | -15.87%-16.48% | -27.40%-26.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC CRBN | 64d64d | 76d50d | 86d87d | 763d752d |
Trading data
NZAC | CRBN | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.95 | $253.67 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.51 | $256.34 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NZAC | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NZAC | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.95 | $253.67 |
| 1D performance | -1.21% | -1.04% |
| AuM | $193.44 M | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
NZAC | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index |
| N° of holdings | 593 | 1033 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 25, 2014 | December 8, 2014 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NZAC
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
CRBN
USA
62.22%
Other
37.78%
Sectors
NZAC
Technology
40.62%
Finance
23.74%
Healthcare
9.05%
Industrials
8.5%
Other
18.09%
CRBN
Technology
36.81%
Finance
21.85%
Healthcare
8.2%
Industrials
8.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.91%
Other
17.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.64%
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.05%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Tesla, Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Equinix, Inc.
0.98%
CRBN
NVIDIA Corp.
4.91%
Apple, Inc.
4.53%
Microsoft Corp.
3.47%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.45%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.03%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.83%
Broadcom Inc.
1.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.21%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.07%
Tesla, Inc.
1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.96%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.89%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.86%
Johnson & Johnson
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about NZAC and CRBN
How have the NZAC and CRBN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD), while CRBN has returned 10.69%. That puts CRBN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or CRBN?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$457K in flows, compared to +$87M for CRBN.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or CRBN?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 12.29%, while CRBN experienced 14.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or CRBN?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC holds $193.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while CRBN manages $1.18 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and CRBN ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CRBN focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and CRBN ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. CRBN holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or CRBN?
NZAC holds 600 securities with 33.64% of its assets in the top 15. CRBN has 1038 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.05%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
