NZACvsACWIETF Comparison
ETF 1
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the segment. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. NZAC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, ACWI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NZAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$457K in YTD flows. ACWI performs better with 12.22% YTD performance, and +$4.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NZAC vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC ACWI | +0.01%+0.12% | +0.54%+0.85% | +8.17%+12.22% | +10.67%+16.01% | +69.54%+77.06% | +54.93%+66.02% |
| Flows | NZAC ACWI | -- | --$747M | -$457K+$4.15B | -$457K+$5.97B | -$129M+$3.67B | +$9M+$5.95B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC ACWI | +10.83%+11.60% | +12.29%+13.79% | +12.63%+14.30% | +14.28%+15.97% |
| Max drawdown | NZAC ACWI | -2.99%-3.01% | -9.86%-9.61% | -15.87%-16.56% | -27.40%-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC ACWI | 64d64d | 76d48d | 86d87d | 763d750d |
Trading data
NZAC | ACWI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.95 | $158.13 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $46.51 | $157.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.95 | $158.13 |
| 1D performance | -1.21% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $193.44 M | $32.62 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index | MSCI ACWI Index |
| N° of holdings | 593 | 2138 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 25, 2014 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NZAC
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
ACWI
USA
62.07%
Other
37.93%
Sectors
NZAC
Technology
40.62%
Finance
23.74%
Healthcare
9.05%
Industrials
8.5%
Other
18.09%
ACWI
Technology
36.76%
Finance
18.35%
Industrials
9.15%
Healthcare
8.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.16%
Other
19.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.64%
ACWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Tesla, Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Equinix, Inc.
0.98%
ACWI
NVIDIA Corp.
4.87%
Apple, Inc.
4.46%
Microsoft Corp.
3.43%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.79%
Broadcom Inc.
1.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.04%
Tesla, Inc.
1.01%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.89%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.85%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.74%
Frequently asked questions about NZAC and ACWI
How have the NZAC and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC is up 8.17% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has returned 12.22%. That puts ACWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$457K in flows, compared to +$4.15B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or ACWI?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 12.29%, while ACWI experienced 13.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or ACWI?
As of October 16, 2026, NZAC holds $193.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $32.62 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and ACWI ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and ACWI ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or ACWI?
NZAC holds 600 securities with 33.64% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2189 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NZAC & ACWI
Advertisement
