Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NZACvsACWIETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. NZAC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ACWI's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. NZAC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. NZAC is down -3.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. ACWI performs better with -1.43% YTD performance, and +$2.87B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NZAC and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NZAC vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NZAC ACWI | -3.86%-4.35% | -3.30%-0.68% | -3.98%-1.43% | +19.29%+23.16% | +63.00%+70.61% | +50.64%+59.57% |
| Flows | NZAC ACWI | -$9M+$1.30B | -$9M+$3.68B | -$9M+$2.87B | -$5M+$5.06B | -$140M+$712M | +$13M+$4.69B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NZAC ACWI | +10.86%+12.75% | +13.99%+16.62% | +12.17%+13.72% | +13.93%+15.57% |
| Max drawdown | NZAC ACWI | -5.96%-6.07% | -12.40%-13.45% | -15.87%-16.56% | -27.40%-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | NZAC ACWI | 44d16d | 37d45d | 86d87d | 763d750d |
NZAC | ACWI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.08 | $139.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.48 | $140.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NZAC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.08 | $139.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.97% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $164.59 M | $27.58 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.32% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NZAC and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NZAC is down -3.98% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has lost -1.43%. That puts ACWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NZAC or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the NZAC ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$2.87B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: NZAC or ACWI?
Over the past year, NZAC had a volatility of 13.99%, while ACWI experienced 16.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: NZAC or ACWI?
As of March 13, 2026, NZAC holds $164.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $27.58 B.
What sectors do the NZAC and ACWI ETFs invest in?
NZAC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NZAC ETF and ACWI ETF?
NZAC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NZAC or ACWI?
NZAC holds 677 securities with 31.99% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2264 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
